mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning by Surprise: Adaptive Mitigation of Model Collapse in Large Language Models

arXiv 2410.12341 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Model collapse from synthetic data

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI-generated content increasingly populates the web, generative AI models are at growing risk of being trained on their own outputs, a process known as AI autophagy. This feedback loop has been shown to induce model collapse, typically characterized by a loss of diversity in generated content. However, existing work offers a limited understanding of this phenomenon and relies on mitigation strategies that assume access to human-authored data. In this paper, we conduct extensive simulations across multiple datasets and LLMs to address key gaps in the study of model collapse. First, we introduce model-intrinsic measures based on next-token probability distributions, showing that model collapse corresponds to an increasing concentration of probability mass on a small set of tokens. Second, we demonstrate that model collapse is also associated with a loss of common sense, as measured by a decline in commonsense inference accuracy. Third, we identify perplexity (a measure of model "surprise") as a key driver of collapse: fine-tuning on the least "surprising" documents leads to more severe degeneration. Building on this insight, we propose a perplexity-based filtering strategy that prioritizes high-surprise documents during fine-tuning. Unlike existing approaches, our method does not require distinguishing between human-authored and AI-generated content. Across datasets and LLM families, this strategy consistently mitigates model collapse, achieving performance comparable to, and in some cases better than, human-data baselines, while substantially reducing the concentration of next-token probabilities. Overall, our results provide a unified, model-centric understanding of model collapse and suggest practical, scalable strategies for training generative AI systems in increasingly synthetic environments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Model collapse from synthetic data, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 23 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

Builds on

23 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires Verification11 Jun
  2. 2024How Bad is Training on Synthetic Data? A Statistical Analysis of Language Model Collapse7 Apr
  3. 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data1 Apr
  4. 2024Model Collapse Demystified: The Case of Regression12 Feb
  5. 2024A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Laws10 Feb

Other references · 18

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  2. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  3. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  4. 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 548
  5. 2021XL-Sum: Large-Scale Multilingual Abstractive Summarization for 44 Languagescited by 347
  6. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
  7. 2023On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Datacited by 100
  8. 2023The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Textcited by 100
  9. 2023Large Language Models Suffer From Their Own Output: An Analysis of the Self-Consuming Training Loopcited by 79
  10. 2019Jointly Measuring Diversity and Quality in Text Generation Modelscited by 61
  11. 2022Will Large-scale Generative Models Corrupt Future Datasets?cited by 59
  12. 2023Towards Understanding the Interplay of Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Internetcited by 54
6 more
  1. 2023Combining Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet: Heading towards Evolution or Degradation?cited by 41
  2. 2022Rethinking and Refining the Distinct Metriccited by 27
  3. 2023Human-AI Coevolutioncited by 27
  4. 2023Nepotistically Trained Generative-AI Models Collapsecited by 27
  5. 2023Foundation Models for Natural Language Processing -- Pre-trained Language Models Integrating Mediacited by 8
  6. 2022How Routing Strategies Impact Urban Emissionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ForTIFAI: Fending Off Recursive Training Induced Failure for AI Model Collapse
  2. 2024Strong Model Collapse
  3. 2025A Closer Look at Model Collapse: From a Generalization-to-Memorization Perspective
  4. 2025Epistemic diversity across language models mitigates knowledge collapse
  5. 2026Language Generation with Replay: A Learning-Theoretic View of Model Collapse
  6. 2024Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating World
  7. 2025Knowledge Collapse in LLMs: When Fluency Survives but Facts Fail under Recursive Synthetic Training
  8. 2025Machine-generated text detection prevents language model collapse