Updating Parametric Knowledge with Context Distillation Retains Post-Training Capabilities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-training endows pretrained LLMs with a variety of desirable skills, including instruction-following, reasoning, and others. However, these post-trained LLMs only encode knowledge up to a cut-off date, necessitating continual adaptation. Unfortunately, existing solutions cannot simultaneously learn new knowledge from an adaptation document corpora and mitigate the forgetting of earlier learned capabilities. To address this, we introduce Distillation via Split Contexts (DiSC), a simple context-distillation based approach for continual knowledge adaptation. methodname~derives student and teacher distributions by conditioning on distinct segments of the training example and minimizes the KL divergence between the shared tokens. This allows us to efficiently apply context-distillation without requiring explicit generation steps during training. We run experiments on four post-trained models and two adaptation domains. Compared to prior finetuning and distillation methods for continual adaptation, DiSC consistently reports the best trade-off between learning new knowledge and mitigating forgetting of previously learned skills like instruction-following, reasoning, and factual knowledge.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2026.
Builds on
33 of 47 references.
References · 33
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
21 more
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 976
- 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 590
- 2021Fast Model Editing at Scalecited by 491
- 2022Memory-Based Model Editing at Scalecited by 443
- 2018Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselinescited by 228
- 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 195
- 2022Learning by Distilling Contextcited by 128
- 2024Model Editing Harms General Abilities of Large Language Models: Regularization to the Rescuecited by 101
- 2024Self-Distillation Bridges Distribution Gap in Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 90
- 2025Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating Forgettingcited by 82
- 2025Small Batch Size Training for Language Models: When Vanilla SGD Works, and Why Gradient Accumulation Is Wastefulcited by 36
- 2022Prompt Injection: Parameterization of Fixed Inputscited by 35
- 2023Propagating Knowledge Updates to LMs Through Distillationcited by 28
- 2025SFT Doesn't Always Hurt General Capabilities: Revisiting Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning in LLMscited by 23
- 2024Domain Adaptation of Llama3-70B-Instruct through Continual Pre-Training and Model Merging: A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 14
- 2025Memorization vs. Reasoning: Updating LLMs with New Knowledgecited by 12
- 2025Understanding the Effects of Domain Finetuning on LLMscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.