Physical Commonsense Reasoning for Lower-Resourced Languages and Dialects: a Study on Basque
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Physical commonsense reasoning represents a fundamental capability of human intelligence, enabling individuals to understand their environment, predict future events, and navigate physical spaces. Recent years have witnessed growing interest in reasoning tasks within Natural Language Processing (NLP). However, no prior research has examined the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on non-question-answering (non-QA) physical commonsense reasoning tasks in low-resource languages such as Basque. Taking the Italian GITA as a starting point, this paper addresses this gap by presenting BasPhyCo, the first non-QA physical commonsense reasoning dataset for Basque, available in both standard and dialectal variants. We evaluate model performance across three hierarchical levels of commonsense understanding: (1) distinguishing between plausible and implausible narratives (accuracy), (2) identifying the conflicting element that renders a narrative implausible (consistency), and (3) determining the specific physical state that creates the implausibility (verifiability). These tasks were assessed using multiple multilingual LLMs as well as models pretrained specifically for Italian and Basque. Results indicate that, in terms of verifiability, LLMs exhibit limited physical commonsense capabilities in low-resource languages such as Basque, especially when processing dialectal variants.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.
Builds on
9 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Analyzing Dialectical Biases in LLMs for Knowledge and Reasoning Benchmarks1 Oct
- 2025Everyday Physics in Korean Contexts: A Culturally Grounded Physical Reasoning Benchmark22 Sep
Other references · 7
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2025Do generative video models understand physical principles?cited by 151
- 2019Recent Advances in Natural Language Inference: A Survey of Benchmarks, Resources, and Approachescited by 64
- 2024DIALECTBENCH: A NLP Benchmark for Dialects, Varieties, and Closely-Related Languagescited by 49
- 2024Advanced Natural-based interaction for the ITAlian language: LLaMAntino-3-ANITAcited by 17
- 2025Instructing Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages: A Systematic Study for Basquecited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Culturally Grounded Physical Commonsense Reasoning in Italian and English: A Submission to the MRL 2025 Shared Task
- 2023NEWTON: Are Large Language Models Capable of Physical Reasoning?
- 2023Dialectical language model evaluation: An initial appraisal of the commonsense spatial reasoning abilities of LLMs
- 2025Global PIQA: Evaluating Commonsense Reasoning Across 100+ Languages and Cultures
- 2025The Gold Medals in an Empty Room: Diagnosing Metalinguistic Reasoning in LLMs with Camlang
- 2025mSCoRe: a Multilingual and Scalable Benchmark for Skill-based Commonsense Reasoning
- 2024Linguini: A benchmark for language-agnostic linguistic reasoning
- 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey