Is Information Density Uniform when Utterances are Grounded on Perception and Discourse?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Uniform Information Density (UID) hypothesis posits that speakers are subject to a communicative pressure to distribute information evenly within utterances, minimising surprisal variance. While this hypothesis has been tested empirically, prior studies are limited exclusively to text-only inputs, abstracting away from the perceptual context in which utterances are produced. In this work, we present the first computational study of UID in visually grounded settings. We estimate surprisal using multilingual vision-and-language models over image-caption data in 30 languages and visual storytelling data in 13 languages, together spanning 11 families. We find that grounding on perception consistently smooths the distribution of information, increasing both global and local uniformity across typologically diverse languages compared to text-only settings. In visual narratives, grounding in both image and discourse contexts has additional effects, with the strongest surprisal reductions occurring at the onset of discourse units. Overall, this study takes a first step towards modelling the temporal dynamics of information flow in ecologically plausible, multimodal language use, and finds that grounded language exhibits greater information uniformity, supporting a context-sensitive formulation of UID.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.
Builds on
20 of 56 references.
References · 20
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
- 2023Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languagescited by 207
- 2016Visual Storytellingcited by 176
- 2022Crossmodal-3600: A Massively Multilingual Multimodal Evaluation Datasetcited by 100
- 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesiscited by 63
- 2020Morphology Matters: A Multilingual Language Modeling Analysiscited by 37
- 2024How to Compute the Probability of a Wordcited by 36
- 2022Bloom Library: Multimodal Datasets in 300+ Languages for a Variety of Downstream Taskscited by 28
- 2024Generalized Measures of Anticipation and Responsivity in Online Language Processingcited by 23
- 2023Information Value: Measuring Utterance Predictability as Distance from Plausible Alternativescited by 22
- 2021BNLP: Natural language processing toolkit for Bengali languagecited by 16
8 more
- 2023A Cross-Linguistic Pressure for Uniform Information Density in Word Ordercited by 16
- 2024Surprise! Uniform Information Density Isn't the Whole Story: Predicting Surprisal Contours in Long-form Discoursecited by 14
- 2024Towards a Similarity-adjusted Surprisal Theorycited by 9
- 2023Revisiting Entropy Rate Constancy in Textcited by 7
- 2025The Harmonic Structure of Information Contourscited by 7
- 2024An information-theoretic model of shallow and deep language comprehensioncited by 6
- 2024The Impact of Token Granularity on the Predictive Power of Language Model Surprisalcited by 5
- 2024A Grounded Typology of Word Classescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Surprisal Minimisation over Goal-directed Alternatives Predicts Production Choice in Dialoguecited by 1
- 2026Expect the Unexpected? Testing the Surprisal of Salient Entitiescited by 0
- 2026The Dynamics of Human and AI-Generated Language: How Semantics Fluctuates across Different Timescalescited by 0
- 2026The Dynamics of Human and AI-Generated Language: How Semantics Fluctuates across Different Timescales9 Jun 2026
- 2026Surprisal Minimisation over Goal-directed Alternatives Predicts Production Choice in Dialogue1 May 2026
- 2026Expect the Unexpected? Testing the Surprisal of Salient Entities12 Apr 2026