The Dynamics of Human and AI-Generated Language: How Semantics Fluctuates across Different Timescales
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spoken language, whether produced by humans or large language models (LLM), unfolds over time with varying semantic content. However, we still lack simple, interpretable time-series features that capture how generic versus specific content is distributed over time, and that can be used to compare human and AI-generated speech. We introduce a semantic-timescale analysis pipeline that turns word-level transcripts with timestamps into semantic time-series. For each spoken narrative, we compute (i) semantic specificity using WordNet-based word depth and (ii) contextual similarity using SBERT embeddings and quantify their temporal dependence using autocorrelation-window measures (ACW-0 and related metrics). We then compare original speech to multiple shuffled controls that selectively disrupt lexical identity, temporal order, and word duration. Across human-read autobiographical narratives, TTS readings, and LLM-generated texts rendered with TTS, we find that segments with longer ACW-0 in the semantic time-series tend to contain more generic vocabulary, whereas segments with shorter ACW-0 are enriched in more specific words. These associations are strongly attenuated or abolished when word order and timing are randomized, indicating that ACW-based measures capture non-trivial temporal organization of semantic content beyond static lexical distributions. Our results suggest that ACW-based semantic timescales are a useful family of features for analyzing and comparing the temporal structure of human and AI-generated speech.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 120 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.
Builds on
10 of 120 references.
References · 10
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Testing AI on language comprehension tasks reveals insensitivity to underlying meaningcited by 45
- 2024Detecting Subtle Differences between Human and Model Languages Using Spectrum of Relative Likelihoodcited by 24
- 2024Surprise! Uniform Information Density Isn't the Whole Story: Predicting Surprisal Contours in Long-form Discoursecited by 17
- 2024A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversationscited by 9
- 2025The Harmonic Structure of Information Contourscited by 9
- 2023FACE: Evaluating Natural Language Generation with Fourier Analysis of Cross-Entropycited by 6
- 2025Identifying the Periodicity of Information in Natural Languagecited by 4
- 2018Calculating the similarity between words and sentences using a lexical database and corpus statisticscited by 3
- 2026Is Information Density Uniform when Utterances are Grounded on Perception and Discourse?cited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.