mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probing Character-level Transformers for the Spanish L-shaped Morphome

arXiv 2608.03452 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When a transformer learns an irregular morphological pattern, what has it learned? Our test case is the Spanish L-shaped morphome, a complex irregular pattern in which the verb's stem alternates in exactly the first-person singular indicative and all subjunctive forms, and whose membership no phonological, semantic, or syntactic feature predicts. Prior studies have shown that character-level transformers can reproduce this pattern, but that evidence describes what models produce, not what they represent. Probing five architectures, twelve trained models each, under lemma-disjoint cross-validation with controls and surface baselines, we show that the models encode the L-shaped class itself, not just its visible alternations. It is decodable above every surface baseline, survives instances in which every form shows the same stem, and probes trained on alternating instances still classify non-alternating ones. The encoding is localized where the stem choice is made, at the stem-final consonant position of the middle decoder, before the alternant is read. And it is item-specific: which verbs a model learned matters far more than which architecture it is. The models store the morphome as an item-specific lexical abstraction, sufficient to reproduce the pattern but not to generalize it as humans do.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  3. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
  4. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  5. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
  6. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
  7. 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
  8. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
  9. 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 151
  10. 2020Applying the Transformer to Character-level Transductioncited by 43
  11. 2018The CoNLL--SIGMORPHON 2018 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflectioncited by 41
  12. 2017CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection in 52 Languagescited by 40
6 more
  1. 2018Recurrent Neural Networks in Linguistic Theory: Revisiting Pinker and Prince (1988) and the Past Tense Debatecited by 27
  2. 2021Subword Pooling Makes a Differencecited by 18
  3. 2016Neural Multi-Source Morphological Reinflectioncited by 7
  4. 2024Frequency matters: Modeling irregular morphological patterns in Spanish with Transformerscited by 5
  5. 2026Character-aware Transformers Learn an Irregular Morphological Pattern Yet None Generalize Like Humanscited by 2
  6. 2026How Tokenization Limits Phonological Knowledge Representation in Language Models and How to Improve Themcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.