Statistical Early Stopping for Reasoning Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
While LLMs have seen substantial improvement in reasoning capabilities, they also sometimes overthink, generating unnecessary reasoning steps, particularly under uncertainty, given ill-posed or ambiguous queries. We introduce statistically principled early stopping methods that monitor uncertainty signals during generation to mitigate this issue. Our first approach is parametric: it models inter-arrival times of uncertainty keywords as a renewal process and applies sequential testing for stopping. Our second approach is nonparametric and provides finite-sample guarantees on the probability of halting too early on well-posed queries. We conduct empirical evaluations on reasoning tasks across several domains and models. Our results indicate that uncertainty-aware early stopping can improve both efficiency and reliability in LLM reasoning, and we observe especially significant gains for math reasoning.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2026.
Builds on
22 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Answering the Unanswerable Is to Err Knowingly: Analyzing and Mitigating Abstention Failures in Large Reasoning Models26 Aug
- 2025Reasoning about Uncertainty: Do Reasoning Models Know When They Don't Know?22 Jun
- 2025Revisiting Overthinking in Long Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-Doubt29 May
- 2025Thought calibration: Efficient and confident test-time scaling23 May
- 2025Think or Not? Exploring Thinking Efficiency in Large Reasoning Models via an Information-Theoretic Lens23 May
- 2025Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMs30 Apr
- 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models22 Apr
- 2025Missing Premise exacerbates Overthinking: Are Reasoning Models losing Critical Thinking Skill?9 Apr
- 2025Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification7 Apr
Other references · 13
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2025Skywork Open Reasoner 1 Technical Reportcited by 165
- 2025AbstentionBench: Reasoning LLMs Fail on Unanswerable Questionscited by 145
- 2025MiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model -- From Pretraining to Posttrainingcited by 121
- 2025AceReason-Nemotron 1.1: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through SFT and RL Synergycited by 77
- 2024Benchmarking Hallucination in Large Language Models based on Unanswerable Math Word Problemcited by 43
- 2024Large Language Models Struggle with Unreasonability in Math Problemscited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Online Reasoning Calibration: Test-Time Training Enables Generalizable Conformal LLM Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026When Should an AI Workflow Release? Always-Valid Inference for Black-Box Generate-Verify Systemscited by 3
- 2026When Is Enough Enough in Self-Evolving LLM Systems?cited by 1
- 2026Learning Perturbations to Extrapolate Your LLMcited by 0
- 2026Conformalized Rate-Adaptive Sensingcited by 0
- 2026Commit Locally, Exit Globally: Coordinating Adaptive Sampling and Early Exit in Diffusion Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026When Is Enough Enough in Self-Evolving LLM Systems?3 Oct 2026
- 2026Commit Locally, Exit Globally: Coordinating Adaptive Sampling and Early Exit in Diffusion Language Models30 Jul 2026
- 2026Conformalized Rate-Adaptive Sensing29 Jul 2026
- 2026Learning Perturbations to Extrapolate Your LLM13 May 2026
- 2026When Should an AI Workflow Release? Always-Valid Inference for Black-Box Generate-Verify Systems13 May 2026
- 2026Online Reasoning Calibration: Test-Time Training Enables Generalizable Conformal LLM Reasoning1 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Early Stopping for Large Reasoning Models via Confidence Dynamics
- 2025ReasonBENCH: Benchmarking the (In)Stability of LLM Reasoning
- 2025Measuring Reasoning Utility in LLMs via Conditional Entropy Reduction
- 2025The Virtues of Brevity: Avoid Overthinking in Parallel Test-Time Reasoning
- 2026Understanding Reasoning in LLMs through Strategic Information Allocation under Uncertainty
- 2026Evaluating LLMs When They Do Not Know the Answer: Statistical Evaluation of Mathematical Reasoning via Comparative Signals
- 2026"I May Not Have Articulated Myself Clearly": Diagnosing Dynamic Instability in LLM Reasoning at Inference Time
- 2025Think Just Enough: Sequence-Level Entropy as a Confidence Signal for LLM Reasoning