mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Video Acquisition for Probabilistic Multi-Task Heart Failure Detection

arXiv 2602.13658 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: Echocardiography with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) must support clinical decision-making under tight bedside time and operator-effort constraints. We introduce a personalized data acquisition strategy in which an RL agent, given a partially observed multi-view study, selects the next view to acquire or terminates acquisition to support heart-failure (HF) assessment. Upon termination, a diagnostic model jointly predicts aortic stenosis (AS) severity and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), two key HF biomarkers, and outputs uncertainty, enabling an explicit trade-off between diagnostic performance and acquisition cost. Methods: We model POCUS as a sequential acquisition problem: at each step, a video selector (RL agent) chooses the next view to acquire or terminates acquisition. Upon termination, a shared multi-view transformer performs multi-task inference with two heads, ordinal AS classification, and LVEF regression, and outputs Gaussian predictive distributions yielding ordinal probabilities over AS classes and EF thresholds. These probabilities drive a reward that balances expected diagnostic benefit against acquisition cost, producing patient-specific acquisition pathways. Results: The dataset comprises 12,180 patient-level studies, split into training/validation/test sets (75/15/15). On the 1,820 test studies, our method matches full-study performance while using 32% fewer videos, achieving 77.2% mean balanced accuracy (bACC) across AS severity classification and LVEF estimation, demonstrating robust multi-task performance under acquisition budgets. Conclusion: Patient-tailored, cost-aware acquisition can streamline POCUS workflows while preserving decision quality, producing interpretable scan pathways suited to bedside use. The framework is extensible to additional cardiac endpoints and merits prospective evaluation for clinical integration.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2026.

Builds on

17 of 35 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  6. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
  7. 2020Reinforcement Learning with Efficient Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 20
  8. 2023Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cost-Effective Medical Diagnosiscited by 20
  9. 2022EchoGNN: Explainable Ejection Fraction Estimation with Graph Neural Networkscited by 17
  10. 2024EchoPrime: A Multi-Video View-Informed Vision-Language Model for Comprehensive Echocardiography Interpretationcited by 17
  11. 2019On Modelling Label Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks: Automatic Estimation of Intra-observer Variability in 2D Echocardiography Quality Assessmentcited by 12
  12. 2023ProtoASNet: Dynamic Prototypes for Inherently Interpretable and Uncertainty-Aware Aortic Stenosis Classification in Echocardiographycited by 11
5 more
  1. 2023GEMTrans: A General, Echocardiography-based, Multi-Level Transformer Framework for Cardiovascular Diagnosiscited by 9
  2. 2021Towards Robust Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 4
  3. 2024Deep Reinforcement Learning for Personalized Diagnostic Decision Pathways Using Electronic Health Records: A Comparative Study on Anemia and Systemic Lupus Erythematosuscited by 3
  4. 2025PRECISE-AS: Personalized Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Point-of-Care Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis Diagnosiscited by 2
  5. 2025Learning to Stop: Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Patient-Level Echocardiographic Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.