RADAR: Revealing Asymmetric Development of Abilities in MLLM Pre-training
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Pre-trained Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) provide a knowledge-rich foundation for post-training by leveraging their inherent perception and reasoning capabilities to solve complex tasks. However, the lack of an efficient evaluation framework impedes the diagnosis of their performance bottlenecks. Current evaluation primarily relies on testing after supervised fine-tuning, which introduces laborious additional training and autoregressive decoding costs. Meanwhile, common pre-training metrics cannot quantify a model's perception and reasoning abilities in a disentangled manner. Furthermore, existing evaluation benchmarks are typically limited in scale or misaligned with pre-training objectives. Thus, we propose RADAR, an efficient ability-centric evaluation framework for Revealing Asymmetric Development of Abilities in MLLM pRe-training. RADAR involves two key components: (1) Soft Discrimination Score, a novel metric for robustly tracking ability development without fine-tuning, based on quantifying nuanced gradations of the model preference for the correct answer over distractors; and (2) Multi-Modal Mixture Benchmark, a new 15K+ sample benchmark for comprehensively evaluating pre-trained MLLMs' perception and reasoning abilities in a 0-shot manner, where we unify authoritative benchmark datasets and carefully collect new datasets, extending the evaluation scope and addressing the critical gaps in current benchmarks. With RADAR, we comprehensively reveal the asymmetric development of perceptual and reasoning capabilities in pretrained MLLMs across diverse factors, including data volume, model size, and pretraining strategy. Our RADAR underscores the need for a decomposed perspective on pre-training ability bottlenecks, informing targeted interventions to advance MLLMs efficiently. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Nieysh/RADAR.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 50 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.
Builds on
50 of 61 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency25 Aug
- 2025R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization13 Mar
- 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling6 Dec
- 2024We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?1 Jul
- 2024Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Dataset22 Feb
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts3 Oct
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?12 Jul
Other references · 43
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
- 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
- 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,534
31 more
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
- 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,221
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
- 2023VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Modelscited by 686
- 2024Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spacescited by 580
- 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 573
- 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 529
- 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 494
- 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 443
- 2025Seed1.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 367
- 2024SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Modelscited by 297
- 2022Visual Spatial Reasoningcited by 288
- 2024MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?cited by 284
- 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 245
- 2024Pixtral 12Bcited by 174
- 2024NVLM: Open Frontier-Class Multimodal LLMscited by 124
- 2023Open-domain Visual Entity Recognition: Towards Recognizing Millions of Wikipedia Entitiescited by 112
- 2025OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Modelscited by 105
- 2024EmbSpatial-Bench: Benchmarking Spatial Understanding for Embodied Tasks with Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 100
- 2025SimpleVQA: Multimodal Factuality Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 61
- 2024Baichuan-Omni Technical Reportcited by 42
- 2025PhyX: Does Your Model Have the "Wits" for Physical Reasoning?cited by 37
- 2025SeePhys: Does Seeing Help Thinking? -- Benchmarking Vision-Based Physics Reasoningcited by 32
- 2025Learning to See Before Seeing: Demystifying LLM Visual Priors from Language Pre-trainingcited by 23
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Evaluating and Advancing Multimodal Large Language Models in Perception Ability Lens
- 2025Aligning MLLM Benchmark With Human Preferences via Structural Equation Modeling
- 2025Will Pre-Training Ever End? A First Step Toward Next-Generation Foundation MLLMs via Self-Improving Systematic Cognition
- 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark
- 2025Unveiling the Compositional Ability Gap in Vision-Language Reasoning Model
- 2024M3GIA: A Cognition Inspired Multilingual and Multimodal General Intelligence Ability Benchmark
- 2025Multifaceted Evaluation of Audio-Visual Capability for MLLMs: Effectiveness, Efficiency, Generalizability and Robustness
- 2025MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following