Knowledge-Based Design Requirements for Generative Social Robots in Higher Education
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative social robots (GSRs) powered by large language models enable adaptive, conversational tutoring but also introduce risks such as misinformation, overreliance, and privacy violations. Existing frameworks for educational technologies and responsible AI primarily define desired behaviors, yet they rarely specify the knowledge prerequisites that enable generative agents to express these behaviors reliably. To address this gap, we adopt a knowledge-based design perspective and investigate what information tutoring-oriented GSRs require to function responsibly and effectively in higher education. Based on twelve semistructured interviews with university students and lecturers, we identified twelve design requirements across three knowledge types: self-knowledge (assertive, conscientious, and friendly personality with customizable role), user-knowledge (personalized information about student learning goals, learning progress, motivation type, emotional state, and background), and context-knowledge (learning materials, educational strategies, courserelated information, and physical learning environment). Drawing from these results, this work provides a structured foundation for the design of tutoring GSRs, aligning generative AI capabilities with pedagogical and ethical expectations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.
Builds on
6 of 78 references.
References · 6
- 2024Understanding Large-Language Model (LLM)-powered Human-Robot Interactioncited by 43
- 2024Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Educationcited by 6
- 2025Exploring persuasive interactions with generative social robots: An experimental frameworkcited by 3
- 2026Understanding Persuasive Interactions between Generative Social Agents and Humans: The Knowledge-based Persuasion Model (KPM)cited by 3
- 2025The Role of Robot Competence, Autonomy, and Personality on Trust Formation in Human-Robot Interactioncited by 2
- 2025Integrating emotional intelligence, memory architecture, and gestures to achieve empathetic humanoid robot interaction in an educational settingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Tutor, Not Solver: Designing a Guardrailed AI Assistant for Learning in Higher Education: A Design Case of PeteChat ↗
- 2025Beyond Automation: Socratic AI, Epistemic Agency, and the Implications of the Emergence of Orchestrated Multi-Agent Learning Architectures
- 2026Modularizing Educational LLM-Agency for Fostering Responsible Learning Assistance
- 2025Building Knowledge from Interactions: An LLM-Based Architecture for Adaptive Tutoring and Social Reasoning
- 2026Addressing the Reality Gap: A Three-Tension Framework for Agentic AI Adoption
- 2026Rethinking Generative AI Literacy: An Integrative, Developmental, and Dialectical Framework for K-12 Teacher Education
- 2026Regulating the AI Tutor: Intentions, Help-Seeking, and Self-Regulated Learning in Adolescent GenAI Use ↗
- 2025Bridging the AI Adoption Gap: Designing an Interactive Pedagogical Agent for Higher Education Instructors