Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contributions: An adoption framework to include GenAI in the university curriculum. It identifies and highlights the role of different stakeholders (university management, students, staff, etc.) during the adoption process. It also proposes an objective approach based upon an evaluation matrix to assess the success and outcome of the GenAI adoption. Background: Universities worldwide are debating and struggling with the adoption of GenAI in their curriculum. Both the faculty and students are unsure about the approach in the absence of clear guidelines through the administration and regulators. This requires an established framework to define a process and articulate the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder involved. Research Questions: Whether the academic ecosystem requires a methodology to adopt GenAI into its curriculum? A systematic approach for the academic staff to ensure the students' learning outcomes are met with the adoption of GenAI. How to measure and communicate the adoption of GenAI in the university setup? Methodology: The methodology employed in this study focuses on examining the university education system and assessing the opportunities and challenges related to incorporating GenAI in teaching and learning. Additionally, it identifies a gap and the absence of a comprehensive framework that obstructs the effective integration of GenAI within the academic environment. Findings: The literature survey results indicate the limited or no adoption of GenAI by the university, which further reflects the dilemma in the minds of different stakeholders. For the successful adoption of GenAI, a standard framework is proposed i) for effective redesign of the course curriculum, ii) for enabling staff and students, iii) to define an evaluation matrix to measure the effectiveness and success of the adoption process.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2026L-PRISMA: An Extension of PRISMA in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)cited by 2
- 2025Experiences with Content Development and Assessment Design in the Era of GenAIcited by 1
- 2026Knowledge-Based Design Requirements for Generative Social Robots in Higher Educationcited by 1
- 2025Navigating the New Landscape: A Conceptual Model for Project-Based Assessment (PBA) in the Age of GenAIcited by 0
- 2025Predicting ChatGPT Use in Assignments: Implications for AI-Aware Assessment Designcited by 0
- 2026Bridging Artificial Intelligence and Power Systems Education Using a Hands-On Executable Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026Bridging Artificial Intelligence and Power Systems Education Using a Hands-On Executable Framework3 Aug 2026
- 2026Knowledge-Based Design Requirements for Generative Social Robots in Higher Education13 Feb 2026
- 2026L-PRISMA: An Extension of PRISMA in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)6 Jan 2026
- 2025Predicting ChatGPT Use in Assignments: Implications for AI-Aware Assessment Design16 Aug 2025
- 2025Navigating the New Landscape: A Conceptual Model for Project-Based Assessment (PBA) in the Age of GenAI14 Aug 2025
- 2025Experiences with Content Development and Assessment Design in the Era of GenAI28 Feb 2025