mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining AI Without Code: A User Study on Explainable AI

arXiv 2602.11159 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2025cs.AI cs.HC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing use of Machine Learning (ML) in sensitive domains such as healthcare, finance, and public policy has raised concerns about the transparency of automated decisions. Explainable AI (XAI) addresses this by clarifying how models generate predictions, yet most methods demand technical expertise, limiting their value for novices. This gap is especially critical in no-code ML platforms, which seek to democratize AI but rarely include explainability. We present a human-centered XAI module in DashAI, an open-source no-code ML platform. The module integrates three complementary techniques, which are Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), Permutation Feature Importance (PFI), and KernelSHAP, into DashAI's workflow for tabular classification. A user study (N = 20; ML novices and experts) evaluated usability and the impact of explanations. Results show: (i) high task success (≥80%) across all explainability tasks; (ii) novices rated explanations as useful, accurate, and trustworthy on the Explanation Satisfaction Scale (ESS, Cronbach's α = 0.74, a measure of internal consistency), while experts were more critical of sufficiency and completeness; and (iii) explanations improved perceived predictability and confidence on the Trust in Automation scale (TiA, α = 0.60), with novices showing higher trust than experts. These findings highlight a central challenge for XAI in no-code ML, making explanations both accessible to novices and sufficiently detailed for experts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2025.

Builds on

21 of 50 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  4. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
  5. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 225
  6. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
  7. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  8. 2024Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Toolscited by 170
  9. 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
  10. 2021Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiencescited by 123
  11. 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
  12. 2019Unrestricted Permutation forces Extrapolation: Variable Importance Requires at least One More Model, or There Is No Free Variable Importancecited by 85
9 more
  1. 2022Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanationscited by 84
  2. 2021AI in Finance: Challenges, Techniques and Opportunitiescited by 81
  3. 2018How do Humans Understand Explanations from Machine Learning Systems? An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
  4. 2020Model-agnostic Feature Importance and Effects with Dependent Features -- A Conditional Subgroup Approachcited by 37
  5. 2022Stop ordering machine learning algorithms by their explainability! A user-centered investigation of performance and explainabilitycited by 21
  6. 2022Explainable AI for Bioinformatics: Methods, Tools, and Applicationscited by 11
  7. 2024XEdgeAI: A Human-centered Industrial Inspection Framework with Data-centric Explainable Edge AI Approachcited by 7
  8. 2024Explainability in JupyterLab and Beyond: Interactive XAI Systems for Integrated and Collaborative Workflowscited by 2
  9. 2025User Perception of Attention Visualizations: Effects on Interpretability Across Evidence-Based Medical Documentscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.