mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detection via Contrast with Normal Prototypes

arXiv 2602.10708 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The task of graph-level anomaly detection (GLAD) is to identify anomalous graphs that deviate significantly from the majority of graphs in a dataset. While deep GLAD methods have shown promising performance, their black-box nature limits their reliability and deployment in real-world applications. Although some recent methods have made attempts to provide explanations for anomaly detection results, they either provide explanations without referencing normal graphs, or rely on abstract latent vectors as prototypes rather than concrete graphs from the dataset. To address these limitations, we propose Prototype-based Graph-Level Anomaly Detection (ProtoGLAD), an interpretable unsupervised framework that provides explanation for each detected anomaly by explicitly contrasting with its nearest normal prototype graph. It employs a point-set kernel to iteratively discover multiple normal prototype graphs and their associated clusters from the dataset, then identifying graphs distant from all discovered normal clusters as anomalies. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that ProtoGLAD achieves competitive anomaly detection performance compared to state-of-the-art GLAD methods while providing better human-interpretable prototype-based explanations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.

Builds on

16 of 32 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  3. 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
  4. 2019InfoGraph: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Graph-Level Representation Learning via Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 441
  5. 2017graph2vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Graphscited by 230
  6. 2022Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural Networkscited by 188
  7. 2019Wasserstein Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernelscited by 104
  8. 2014Propagation Kernelscited by 88
  9. 2021Deep Graph-level Anomaly Detection by Glocal Knowledge Distillationcited by 67
  10. 2020On Using Classification Datasets to Evaluate Graph-Level Outlier Detection: Peculiar Observations and New Insightscited by 53
  11. 2022Raising the Bar in Graph-level Anomaly Detectioncited by 45
  12. 2023Towards Self-Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detectioncited by 41
4 more
  1. 2023Rayleigh Quotient Graph Neural Networks for Graph-level Anomaly Detectioncited by 19
  2. 2024Rethinking Reconstruction-based Graph-Level Anomaly Detection: Limitations and a Simple Remedycited by 13
  3. 2019Nearest-Neighbour-Induced Isolation Similarity and its Impact on Density-Based Clusteringcited by 11
  4. 2020Point-Set Kernel Clusteringcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.