Semantic Labeling for Third-Party Cybersecurity Risk Assessment: A Semi-Supervised Approach to Intent-Aware Question Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Third-Party Risk Assessment (TPRA) relies on large repositories of cybersecurity compliance questions used to assess external suppliers against standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 and NIST. In practice, not all questions are relevant for a specific supplier and selecting questions for a given assessment context remains a manual and time-consuming task. Existing question retrieval approaches based on lexical or semantic similarity can identify topically related questions, but they often fail to capture the underlying assessment intent, including control domain and evaluation scope. To address this limitation, we investigate whether an explicit semantic label space can improve intent-aware TPRA question selection. In particular, we separate label space discovery from large-scale label assignment. We start by discovering overlapping clusters of semantically similar questions and then exploit LLMs to assign unique labels for each cluster. Second, we propagate labels through k-nearest neighbors (kNN) for a larger-scale question annotation. Question retrieval is finally achieved by similarity measure of the query with respect to the extracted labels instead of the questions themselves. This reduces repeated LLM calls while preserving label consistency. Experimental results show that the proposed semi-supervised framework reduces labeling cost and runtime compared with per-question LLM annotation while maintaining label quality and improving efficiency. Furthermore, label-based retrieval achieves better alignment with cybersecurity control domains and assessment scope than similarity-based retrieval, highlighting the value of semantic labels as an intermediate representation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
References · 11
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
- 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
- 2024Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Surveycited by 201
- 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
- 2024Is Cosine-Similarity of Embeddings Really About Similarity?cited by 89
- 2023Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language modelscited by 72
Built on by
Not cited yet.