Mitigating the Likelihood Paradox in Flow-based OOD Detection via Entropy Manipulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep generative models that can tractably compute input likelihoods, including normalizing flows, often assign unexpectedly high likelihoods to out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. We mitigate this likelihood paradox by manipulating input entropy based on semantic similarity, applying stronger perturbations to inputs that are less similar to an in-distribution memory bank. We provide a theoretical analysis showing that entropy control increases the expected log-likelihood gap between in-distribution and OOD samples in favor of the in-distribution, and we explain why the procedure works without any additional training of the density model. We then evaluate our method against likelihood-based OOD detectors on standard benchmarks and find consistent AUROC improvements over baselines, supporting our explanation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.
Builds on
30 of 55 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
- 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
18 more
- 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
- 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 364
- 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 256
- 2021FastFlow: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Localization via 2D Normalizing Flowscited by 225
- 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 220
- 2019Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative modelscited by 186
- 2020Stochastic Normalizing Flowscited by 156
- 2021Understanding Failures in Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Generative Modelscited by 89
- 2020Density of States Estimation for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 74
- 2020Understanding Anomaly Detection with Deep Invertible Networks through Hierarchies of Distributions and Featurescited by 64
- 2021Hierarchical VAEs Know What They Don't Knowcited by 58
- 2023normflows: A PyTorch Package for Normalizing Flowscited by 56
- 2020Perfect density models cannot guarantee anomaly detectioncited by 39
- 2020Detecting Out-of-distribution Samples via Variational Auto-encoder with Reliable Uncertainty Estimationcited by 24
- 2024A Geometric Explanation of the Likelihood OOD Detection Paradoxcited by 22
- 2021Entropic Issues in Likelihood-Based OOD Detectioncited by 16
- 2024Understanding Likelihood of Normalizing Flow and Image Complexity through the Lens of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.