mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SWE-AGI: Benchmarking Specification-Driven Software Construction with MoonBit in the Era of Autonomous Agents

arXiv 2602.09447 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive coding capabilities, their ability to autonomously build production-scale software from explicit specifications remains an open question. We introduce SWE-AGI, an open-source benchmark for evaluating end-to-end, specification-driven construction of software systems written in MoonBit. SWE-AGI tasks require LLM-based agents to implement parsers, interpreters, binary decoders, and SAT solvers strictly from authoritative standards and RFCs under a fixed API scaffold. Each task involves implementing 1,000-10,000 lines of core logic, corresponding to weeks or months of engineering effort for an experienced human developer. By leveraging the nascent MoonBit ecosystem, SWE-AGI minimizes data leakage, forcing agents to rely on long-horizon architectural reasoning rather than code retrieval. Across frontier models, gpt-5.3-codex achieves the best overall performance (solving 19/22 tasks, 86.4%), outperforming claude-opus-4.6 (15/22, 68.2%), and kimi-2.5 exhibits the strongest performance among open-source models. Performance degrades sharply with increasing task difficulty, particularly on hard, specification-intensive systems. Behavioral analysis further reveals that as codebases scale, code reading, rather than writing, becomes the dominant bottleneck in AI-assisted development. Overall, while specification-driven autonomous software engineering is increasingly viable, substantial challenges remain before it can reliably support production-scale development.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

20 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SWE-EVO: Benchmarking Coding Agents in Long-Horizon Software Evolution Scenarios20 Dec
  2. 2025Automatically Benchmarking LLM Code Agents through Agent-Driven Annotation and Evaluation28 Oct
  3. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May

Other references · 17

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  4. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  5. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  6. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  7. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  8. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  9. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  10. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  11. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 910
  12. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 879
5 more
  1. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
  2. 2023RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion Systemscited by 346
  3. 2025SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?cited by 254
  4. 2022MultiPL-E: A Scalable and Extensible Approach to Benchmarking Neural Code Generationcited by 132
  5. 2025OSS-Bench: Benchmark Generator for Coding LLMscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building Working Codebases from Scratch
  2. 2026SWE-Cycle: Benchmarking Code Agents across the Complete Issue Resolution Cycle
  3. 2025SWE-Compass: Towards Unified Evaluation of Agentic Coding Abilities for Large Language Models
  4. 2026SWE-CI: Evaluating Agent Capabilities in Maintaining Codebases via Continuous Integration
  5. 2025Agint: Agentic Graph Compilation for Software Engineering Agents
  6. 2025SWE-Sharp-Bench: A Reproducible Benchmark for C# Software Engineering Tasks
  7. 2026ArchBench: Benchmarking Generative-AI for Software Architecture Tasks ↗
  8. 2026SWE-Hub: A Unified Production System for Scalable, Executable Software Engineering Tasks