Accelerating Social Science Research via Agentic Hypothesization and Experimentation
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Data-driven social science research is inherently slow, relying on iterative cycles of observation, hypothesis generation, and experimental validation. While recent data-driven methods promise to accelerate parts of this process, they largely fail to support end-to-end scientific discovery. To address this gap, we introduce EXPERIGEN, an agentic framework that operationalizes end-to-end discovery through a Bayesian optimization inspired two-phase search, in which a Generator proposes candidate hypotheses and an Experimenter evaluates them empirically. Across multiple domains, EXPERIGEN consistently discovers 2-4x more statistically significant hypotheses that are 7-17 percent more predictive than prior approaches, and naturally extends to complex data regimes including multimodal and relational datasets. Beyond statistical performance, hypotheses must be novel, empirically grounded, and actionable to drive real scientific progress. To evaluate these qualities, we conduct an expert review of machine-generated hypotheses, collecting feedback from senior faculty. Among 25 reviewed hypotheses, 88 percent were rated moderately or strongly novel, 70 percent were deemed impactful and worth pursuing, and most demonstrated rigor comparable to senior graduate-level research. Finally, recognizing that ultimate validation requires real-world evidence, we conduct the first A/B test of LLM-generated hypotheses, observing statistically significant results with p less than 1e-6 and a large effect size of 344 percent.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2026.
Builds on
12 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 11
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
- 2023Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinementcited by 89
- 2024Hypothesis Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 68
- 2025HypoBench: Towards Systematic and Principled Benchmarking for Hypothesis Generationcited by 34
- 2025AutoDiscovery: Open-ended Scientific Discovery via Bayesian Surprisecited by 28
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders for Hypothesis Generationcited by 24
- 2023Interpretable-by-Design Text Understanding with Iteratively Generated Concept Bottleneckcited by 21
- 2024Measuring and Improving Persuasiveness of Large Language Modelscited by 18
- 2018ChangeMyView Through Concessions: Do Concessions Increase Persuasion?cited by 5
- 2024Teaching Human Behavior Improves Content Understanding Abilities Of LLMscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AgentSociety 2: An Integrated Research Environment for Executable Social Science
- 2026Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results
- 2025Hypothesis Hunting with Evolving Networks of Autonomous Scientific Agents
- 2026AI Coding Agents Can Reproduce Social Science Findings
- 2025Exploring Large Language Model Agents for Piloting Social Experiments
- 2025BoxingGym: Benchmarking Progress in Automated Experimental Design and Model Discovery
- 2025Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
- 2026CausalArena: Benchmarking Causal Discovery in the Foundation Model Era