mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automated rock joint trace mapping using a supervised learning model trained on synthetic data generated by parametric modelling

arXiv 2602.07590 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a geology-driven machine learning method for automated rock joint trace mapping from images. The approach combines geological modelling, synthetic data generation, and supervised image segmentation to address limited real data and class imbalance. First, discrete fracture network models are used to generate synthetic jointed rock images at field-relevant scales via parametric modelling, preserving joint persistence, connectivity, and node-type distributions. Second, segmentation models are trained using mixed training and pretraining followed by fine-tuning on real images. The method is tested in box and slope domains using several real datasets. The results show that synthetic data can support supervised joint trace detection when real data are scarce. Mixed training performs well when real labels are consistent (e.g. box-domain), while fine-tuning is more robust when labels are noisy (e.g. slope-domain where labels can be biased, incomplete, and inconsistent). Fully zero-shot prediction from synthetic model remains limited, but useful generalisation is achieved by fine-tuning with a small number of real data. Qualitative analysis shows clearer and more geologically meaningful joint traces than indicated by quantitative metrics alone. The proposed method supports reliable joint mapping and provides a basis for further work on domain adaptation and evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 87 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  5. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  6. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  8. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  9. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  10. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  11. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,518
  12. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,063
9 more
  1. 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 858
  2. 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 816
  3. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 659
  4. 2017A Review on Deep Learning Techniques Applied to Semantic Segmentationcited by 122
  5. 2024The Unmet Promise of Synthetic Training Images: Using Retrieved Real Images Performs Bettercited by 19
  6. 2024Boundless: Generating Photorealistic Synthetic Data for Object Detection in Urban Streetscapescited by 4
  7. 2024CrackSegDiff: Diffusion Probability Model-based Multi-modal Crack Segmentationcited by 2
  8. 2025Development of Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Training on Real and Synthetic Data: Benchmark on Two Mixed Training Strategiescited by 2
  9. 2021PointCrack3D: Crack Detection in Unstructured Environments using a 3D-Point-Cloud-Based Deep Neural Networkcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.