Statistical inference after variable selection in Cox models: A simulation study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Choosing relevant predictors is central to the analysis of biomedical time-to-event data. Classical frequentist inference, however, presumes that the set of covariates is fixed in advance and does not account for data-driven variable selection. As a consequence, naive post-selection inference may be biased and misleading. In right-censored survival settings, these issues may be further exacerbated by the additional uncertainty induced by censoring. We investigate several inference procedures applied after variable selection for the coefficients of the Lasso and its extension, the adaptive Lasso, in the context of the Cox model. The methods considered include sample splitting, exact post-selection inference, and the debiased Lasso. Their performance is examined in a neutral simulation study reflecting realistic covariate structures and censoring rates commonly encountered in biomedical applications. To complement the simulation results, we illustrate the practical behavior of these procedures in an applied example using a publicly available survival dataset.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.
Builds on
6 of 43 references.
References · 6
- 2013Exact post-selection inference, with application to the lassocited by 90
- 2014Optimal Inference After Model Selectioncited by 63
- 2017Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methodscited by 47
- 2018Confidence intervals for high-dimensional Cox modelscited by 3
- 2021Statistical Inference for Cox Proportional Hazards Models with a Diverging Number of Covariatescited by 2
- 2020Evaluating methods for Lasso selective inference in biomedical research by a comparative simulation studycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.