Fair Decisions from Calibrated Scores: Achieving Optimal Classification While Satisfying Sufficiency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Binary classification based on predicted probabilities (scores) is a fundamental task in supervised machine learning. While thresholding scores is Bayes-optimal in the unconstrained setting, using a single threshold generally violates statistical group fairness constraints. Under independence (statistical parity) and separation (equalized odds), such thresholding suffices when the scores already satisfy the corresponding criterion. However, this does not extend to sufficiency: even perfectly group-calibrated scores -- including true class probabilities -- violate predictive parity after thresholding. In this work, we present an exact solution for optimal binary (randomized) classification under sufficiency, assuming finite sets of group-calibrated scores. We provide a geometric characterization of the feasible pairs of positive predictive value (PPV) and false omission rate (FOR) achievable by such classifiers, and use it to derive a simple post-processing algorithm that attains the optimal classifier using only group-calibrated scores and group membership. Finally, since sufficiency and separation are generally incompatible, we identify the classifier that minimizes deviation from separation subject to sufficiency, and show that it can also be obtained by our algorithm, often achieving performance comparable to the optimum.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.
Builds on
12 of 19 references.
References · 12
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
- 2020Distribution-free binary classification: prediction sets, confidence intervals and calibrationcited by 79
- 2022Enforcing Group Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: Utility Maximization Under Sufficiencycited by 19
- 2018From Soft Classifiers to Hard Decisions: How fair can we be?cited by 16
- 2022Fair Bayes-Optimal Classifiers Under Predictive Paritycited by 16
- 2024OxonFair: A Flexible Toolkit for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.