mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TangramSR: Can Vision-Language Models Reason in Continuous Geometric Space?

arXiv 2602.05570 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Humans excel at spatial reasoning tasks like Tangram puzzle assembly through cognitive processes involving mental rotation, iterative refinement, and visual feedback. Inspired by how humans solve Tangram puzzles through trial-and-error, observation, and correction, we design a framework that models these human cognitive mechanisms. However, comprehensive experiments across five representative Vision-Language Models (VLMs) reveal systematic failures in continuous geometric reasoning: average IoU of only 0.41 on single-piece tasks, dropping to 0.23 on two-piece composition, far below human performance where children can complete Tangram tasks successfully. This paper addresses a fundamental challenge in self-improving AI: can models iteratively refine their predictions at test time without parameter updates? We introduce a test-time self-refinement framework that combines in-context learning (ICL) with reward-guided feedback loops, inspired by human cognitive processes. Our training-free verifier-refiner agent applies recursive refinement loops that iteratively self-refine predictions based on geometric consistency feedback, achieving IoU improvements from 0.63 to 0.932 on medium-triangle cases without any model retraining. This demonstrates that incorporating human-inspired iterative refinement mechanisms through ICL and reward loops can substantially enhance geometric reasoning in VLMs, moving self-improving AI from promise to practice in continuous spatial domains. Our work is available at this anonymous link https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TangramVLM-F582/.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

Builds on

26 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025GIQ: Benchmarking 3D Geometric Reasoning of Vision Foundation Models with Simulated and Real Polyhedra9 Jun
  2. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities22 Jan

Other references · 24

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  6. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  7. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  8. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
  9. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  10. 2023LLaMA-Adapter V2: Parameter-Efficient Visual Instruction Modelcited by 602
  11. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
  12. 2021A Survey of Embodied AI: From Simulators to Research Taskscited by 256
12 more
  1. 2024MMLongBench-Doc: Benchmarking Long-context Document Understanding with Visualizationscited by 174
  2. 2024RoboSpatial: Teaching Spatial Understanding to 2D and 3D Vision-Language Models for Roboticscited by 133
  3. 2025Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2cited by 95
  4. 2022Abstract Visual Reasoning with Tangram Shapescited by 43
  5. 2025Why Vision Language Models Struggle with Visual Arithmetic? Towards Enhanced Chart and Geometry Understandingcited by 23
  6. 2025Unfolding Spatial Cognition: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Visual Simulationscited by 21
  7. 2025Exploiting Temporal State Space Sharing for Video Semantic Segmentationcited by 15
  8. 2026Thinking in Frames: How Visual Context and Test-Time Scaling Empower Video Reasoningcited by 10
  9. 2023The Role of Linguistic Priors in Measuring Compositional Generalization of Vision-Language Modelscited by 5
  10. 2021Learning From How Humans Correctcited by 2
  11. 2023Compositional Learning of Visually-Grounded Concepts Using Reinforcementcited by 2
  12. 2025Master Rules from Chaos: Learning to Reason, Plan, and Interact from Chaos for Tangram Assemblycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025GeoBench: Rethinking Multimodal Geometric Problem-Solving via Hierarchical Evaluation
  2. 2025Probing the effectiveness of World Models for Spatial Reasoning through Test-time Scaling
  3. 2025Imagine in Space: Exploring the Frontier of Spatial Intelligence and Reasoning Efficiency in Vision Language Models
  4. 2025Jigsaw-Puzzles: From Seeing to Understanding to Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Reasoning or Pattern Matching? Probing Large Vision-Language Models with Visual Puzzles
  6. 2026TangramPuzzle: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models with Compositional Spatial Reasoning
  7. 2026Self-Evolving Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Geometric Logic Consistency
  8. 2025Ascending the Infinite Ladder: Benchmarking Spatial Deformation Reasoning in Vision-Language Models