mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Once Correct, Still Wrong: Counterfactual Hallucination in Multilingual Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2602.05437 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2026cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) can achieve high accuracy while still accepting culturally plausible but visually incorrect interpretations. Existing hallucination benchmarks rarely test this failure mode, particularly outside Western contexts and English. We introduce M2CQA, a culturally grounded multimodal benchmark built from images spanning 17 MENA countries, paired with contrastive true and counterfactual statements in English, Arabic, and its dialects. To isolate hallucination beyond raw accuracy, we propose the CounterFactual Hallucination Rate (CFHR), which measures counterfactual acceptance conditioned on correctly answering the true statement. Evaluating state-of-the-art VLMs under multiple prompting strategies, we find that CFHR rises sharply in Arabic, especially in dialects, even when true-statement accuracy remains high. Moreover, reasoning-first prompting consistently increases counterfactual hallucination, while answering before justifying improves robustness. We make the dataset publicly available for the community (https://huggingface.co/datasets/QCRI/M2CQA)).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

Builds on

14 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Survey of Multimodal Hallucination Evaluation and Detection25 Jul
  2. 2025Treble Counterfactual VLMs: A Causal Approach to Hallucination8 Mar
  3. 2024PhD: A ChatGPT-Prompted Visual hallucination Evaluation Dataset17 Mar
  4. 2023Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision27 Nov
  5. 2023Negative Object Presence Evaluation (NOPE) to Measure Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models9 Oct

Other references · 9

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  3. 2022Can language models learn from explanations in context?cited by 248
  4. 2024CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering Benchmarkcited by 118
  5. 2024AraDiCE: Benchmarks for Dialectal and Cultural Capabilities in LLMscited by 46
  6. 2023Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Modelscited by 23
  7. 2024Dallah: A Dialect-Aware Multimodal Large Language Model for Arabiccited by 16
  8. 2025The Landscape of Arabic Large Language Models (ALLMs): A New Era for Arabic Language Technologycited by 12
  9. 2025AIN: The Arabic INclusive Large Multimodal Modelcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Mitigating Multilingual Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025Counterfactual Segmentation Reasoning: Diagnosing and Mitigating Pixel-Grounding Hallucination
  3. 2025CLAIM: Mitigating Multilingual Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models with Cross-Lingual Attention Intervention
  4. 2025Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination: A Training Bias Perspective
  5. 2026HIVE: Understanding Post-Hallucination Reasoning in Vision Language Models
  6. 2026ReactBench: A Cause-Driven Benchmark for Multimodal Hallucination via Systematic Evaluation
  7. 2026LLM-as-Judge Framework for Evaluating Tone-Induced Hallucination in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024Hallucination in Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey on Causes, Corrections, and Evaluations