mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beware Untrusted Simulators -- Reward-Free Backdoor Attacks in Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2602.05089 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2026cs.CR cs.LG cs.ROcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Simulated environments are a key piece in the success of Reinforcement Learning (RL), allowing practitioners and researchers to train decision making agents without running expensive experiments on real hardware. Simulators remain a security blind spot, however, enabling adversarial developers to alter the dynamics of their released simulators for malicious purposes. Therefore, in this work we highlight a novel threat, demonstrating how simulator dynamics can be exploited to stealthily implant action-level backdoors into RL agents. The backdoor then allows an adversary to reliably activate targeted actions in an agent upon observing a predefined ``trigger'', leading to potentially dangerous consequences. Traditional backdoor attacks are limited in their strong threat models, assuming the adversary has near full control over an agent's training pipeline, enabling them to both alter and observe agent's rewards. As these assumptions are infeasible to implement within a simulator, we propose a new attack ``Daze'' which is able to reliably and stealthily implant backdoors into RL agents trained for real world tasks without altering or even observing their rewards. We provide formal proof of Daze's effectiveness in guaranteeing attack success across general RL tasks along with extensive empirical evaluations on both discrete and continuous action space domains. We additionally provide the first example of RL backdoor attacks transferring to real, robotic hardware. These developments motivate further research into securing all components of the RL training pipeline to prevent malicious attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

Builds on

19 of 32 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  4. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
  5. 2021Isaac Gym: High Performance GPU-Based Physics Simulation For Robot Learningcited by 882
  6. 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 643
  7. 2019Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Controlcited by 167
  8. 2020Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object Detectioncited by 137
  9. 2020Subpopulation Data Poisoning Attackscited by 68
  10. 2021BACKDOORL: Backdoor Attack against Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 66
  11. 2025LeVERB: Humanoid Whole-Body Control with Latent Vision-Language Instructioncited by 40
  12. 2025A Survey of Sim-to-Real Methods in RL: Progress, Prospects and Challenges with Foundation Modelscited by 36
7 more
  1. 2019TrojDRL: Trojan Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 29
  2. 2024SleeperNets: Universal Backdoor Poisoning Attacks Against Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 19
  3. 2024Rethinking Out-of-Distribution Detection for Reinforcement Learning: Advancing Methods for Evaluation and Detectioncited by 17
  4. 2022Provable Defense against Backdoor Policies in Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  5. 2024Adversarial Inception Backdoor Attacks against Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  6. 2025UNIDOOR: A Universal Framework for Action-Level Backdoor Attacks in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  7. 2025TrojanTO: Action-Level Backdoor Attacks against Trajectory Optimization Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.