Imposing Boundary Conditions on Neural Operators via Learned Function Extensions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural operators have emerged as powerful surrogates for the solution of partial differential equations (PDEs), yet their ability to handle general, highly variable boundary conditions (BCs) remains limited. Existing approaches often fail when the solution operator exhibits strong sensitivity to boundary forcings. We propose a general framework for conditioning neural operators on complex non-homogeneous BCs through function extensions. Our key idea is to map boundary data to latent pseudo-extensions defined over the entire spatial domain, enabling any standard operator learning architecture to consume boundary information. The resulting operator, coupled with an arbitrary domain-to-domain neural operator, can learn rich dependencies on complex BCs and input domain functions at the same time. To benchmark this setting, we construct 18 challenging datasets spanning Poisson, linear elasticity, and hyperelasticity problems, with highly variable, mixed-type, component-wise, and multi-segment BCs on diverse geometries. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, outperforming baselines by large margins, while requiring no hyperparameter tuning across datasets. Overall, our results demonstrate that learning boundary-to-domain extensions is an effective and practical strategy for imposing complex BCs in existing neural operator frameworks, enabling accurate and robust scientific machine learning models for a broader range of PDE-governed problems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
22 of 34 references.
References · 22
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
- 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 868
- 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 386
- 2021High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalizationcited by 360
- 2021Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkincited by 343
- 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 326
- 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 303
- 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 214
10 more
- 2024Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEscited by 200
- 2024DPOT: Auto-Regressive Denoising Operator Transformer for Large-Scale PDE Pre-Trainingcited by 151
- 2025Geometry Aware Operator Transformer as an Efficient and Accurate Neural Surrogate for PDEs on Arbitrary Domainscited by 62
- 2023Representation Equivalent Neural Operators: a Framework for Alias-free Operator Learningcited by 57
- 2022Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary Conditionscited by 33
- 2024BENO: Boundary-embedded Neural Operators for Elliptic PDEscited by 24
- 2025RIGNO: A Graph-based framework for robust and accurate operator learning for PDEs on arbitrary domainscited by 23
- 2022Guiding continuous operator learning through Physics-based boundary constraintscited by 21
- 2024PhyMPGN: Physics-encoded Message Passing Graph Network for spatiotemporal PDE systemscited by 18
- 2024Learning the boundary-to-domain mapping using Lifting Product Fourier Neural Operators for partial differential equationscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.