mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking Weight Tying: Pseudo-Inverse Tying for LM Stable Training and Updates

arXiv 2602.04556 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Weight tying is widely used in compact language models to reduce parameters by sharing the token table between the input embedding and the output projection. However, parameter sharing alone does not guarantee a stable token interface: during training, the correspondence between encoding tokens into hidden states and decoding hidden states into logits can drift, worsening optimization sensitivity and weakening explainability probes that rely on a meaningful vocabulary-space decoder. We propose Pseudo-Inverse Tying (PIT), which synchronizes embedding and unembedding as coupled projections of a shared latent token memory, guaranteeing a pseudo-inverse-consistent interface throughout training. PIT maintains an orthonormal shared memory, obtained by polar initialization from a source checkpoint for continued pretraining or by random orthonormal initialization for from-scratch pretraining, and introduces a learned symmetric positive definite hidden-space transform parameterized via a Cholesky factor. The output head applies this transform to hidden states before the vocabulary projection, while the embedding applies the inverse transform to token vectors using stable triangular solves, avoiding explicit pseudo-inverse recomputation and vocabulary-sized auxiliary parameters. Beyond improving training stability, PIT provides a cleaner substrate for logit-lens-style and vocabulary-space explainability probes by keeping the input and output token geometries synchronized. We evaluate PIT on on-device models spanning 256M-1.3B parameters. The results show that PIT improves continued-pretraining stability, enforces near-exact token-interface consistency across settings, and yields more predictable lightweight adaptation after continued pretraining, while from-scratch pretraining reveals a trade-off between strict interface consistency and unconstrained optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

Builds on

16 of 25 references.

References · 16

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  5. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  6. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  7. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  8. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
  9. 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 976
  10. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
  11. 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 266
  12. 2024MobileLLM: Optimizing Sub-billion Parameter Language Models for On-Device Use Casescited by 216
4 more
  1. 2023Cerebras-GPT: Open Compute-Optimal Language Models Trained on the Cerebras Wafer-Scale Clustercited by 106
  2. 2016Tying Word Vectors and Word Classifiers: A Loss Framework for Language Modelingcited by 87
  3. 2024Vocabulary-Defined Semantics: Latent Space Clustering for Improving In-Context Learningcited by 7
  4. 2024A Semantic-Aware Layer-Freezing Approach to Computation-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Memory Grafting: Scaling Language Model Pre-training via Offline Conditional Memory
  2. 2023Just CHOP: Embarrassingly Simple LLM Compression
  3. 2026Dense Supervision Is Not Enough: The Readout Blind Spot in Looped Language Models
  4. 2026DualOptim+: Bridging Shared and Decoupled Optimizer States for Better Machine Unlearning in Large Language Models
  5. 2025The Sequential Edge: Inverse-Entropy Voting Beats Parallel Self-Consistency at Matched Compute
  6. 2026Compute Where it Counts: Self Optimizing Language Models
  7. 2026Loop Dropout: Regularizing Shared Updates in Looped Language Models
  8. 2026Improving Few-Step Language Flows with Untied Self-Conditioning