The Role of Dataset Linguistic Structure in the Cultural Awareness of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The global deployment of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about cultural misalignment, yet the linguistic properties of fine-tuning datasets used for cultural adaptation remain poorly understood. We adopt a dataset-centric view of cultural alignment and investigate which properties of post-training data are associated with cultural performance, whether they can guide data selection before fine-tuning, and how their effects vary across languages and model families. We compute lightweight linguistic, semantic, and structural metrics for Arabic, Chinese, and Japanese datasets and apply principal component analysis (PCA) separately within each language. The resulting components form broadly interpretable axes: PC1 is generally dominated by semantic structure, PC2 captures diversity and lexical variation, and PC3 reflects more language-specific organization. We fine-tune LLaMA, Mistral, and DeepSeek models and evaluate them on benchmarks of cultural knowledge, values, and norms. Although the PCA-derived dataset descriptors are associated with downstream performance, the strongest relationships vary across models, benchmarks, and languages, indicating that no single component serves as a universal predictor. Controlled, size-matched subset interventions further show that PCA-guided selection can improve cultural performance when the relevant component and direction are validated against random sampling. PC3 provides the strongest signal for Arabic, while High-PC1 is most effective for Japanese, particularly for LLaMA. Chinese results are weaker and more model-specific and remain exploratory because of smaller subset sizes. Overall, our findings show that lightweight dataset descriptors can support pre-training data diagnostics, but effective cultural adaptation requires language- and architecture-aware selection rather than a universal linguistic criterion.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 50 references.
References · 21
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
- 2024Aya Dataset: An Open-Access Collection for Multilingual Instruction Tuningcited by 174
- 2023Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models: An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensionscited by 111
- 2024Survey of Cultural Awareness in Language Models: Text and Beyondcited by 101
- 2024ArabicMMLU: Assessing Massive Multitask Language Understanding in Arabiccited by 87
- 2023AceGPT, Localizing Large Language Models in Arabiccited by 75
- 2024Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarkingcited by 63
- 2024WorldValuesBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark Dataset for Multi-Cultural Value Awareness of Language Modelscited by 59
- 2024COIG-CQIA: Quality is All You Need for Chinese Instruction Fine-tuningcited by 45
9 more
- 2024Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoningcited by 31
- 2024NativQA: Multilingual Culturally-Aligned Natural Query for LLMscited by 30
- 2024CulturalBench: A Robust, Diverse, and Challenging Cultural Benchmark by Human-AI CulturalTeamingcited by 27
- 2024LLM-GLOBE: A Benchmark Evaluating the Cultural Values Embedded in LLM Outputcited by 27
- 2024Improving Data Efficiency via Curating LLM-Driven Rating Systemscited by 26
- 2024ArabicaQA: A Comprehensive Dataset for Arabic Question Answeringcited by 20
- 2023Data Similarity is Not Enough to Explain Language Model Performancecited by 9
- 2023DSAP: Analyzing Bias Through Demographic Comparison of Datasetscited by 5
- 2025JETHICS: Japanese Ethics Understanding Evaluation Datasetcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.