mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LatentLens: Revealing Highly Interpretable Visual Tokens in LLMs

arXiv 2602.00462 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

Abstract (arXiv)

Transforming a large language model (LLM) into a vision-language model (VLM) can be achieved by mapping the visual tokens from a vision encoder into the embedding space of an LLM. Intriguingly, this mapping can be as simple as a shallow MLP transformation. To understand why LLMs can so readily process visual tokens, we need interpretability methods that reveal what is encoded in the visual token representations at every layer of LLM processing. In this work, we introduce LatentLens, a novel approach for mapping latent representations to descriptions in natural language. LatentLens encodes a large text corpus and stores contextualized token representations for each token in that corpus. Visual token representations are then compared to these contextualized representations and the top-nearest neighbor representations serve as descriptions of the visual token. We evaluate this method on 15 different VLMs, showing that commonly used methods, such as LogitLens, substantially underestimate the interpretability of visual tokens. With LatentLens instead, the majority of visual tokens are interpretable across all studied models and all layers. Qualitatively, we show that the descriptions produced by LatentLens are semantically meaningful and provide more fine-grained interpretations for humans compared to individual tokens. More broadly, our findings contribute new evidence on the alignment between vision and language representations and open up new directions for analyzing the latent representations of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 66 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2026.

Builds on

66 of 87 references.

References · 66

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  6. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  7. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  8. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  9. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  10. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  11. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  12. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
38 more
  1. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
  2. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  3. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  4. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  5. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
  6. 2024Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Modelscited by 904
  7. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  8. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  9. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
  10. 2024PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfercited by 679
  11. 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 657
  12. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 579
  13. 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 557
  14. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
  15. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 522
  16. 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 512
  17. 2024Transfusion: Predict the Next Token and Diffuse Images with One Multi-Modal Modelcited by 468
  18. 2024Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Modelscited by 321
  19. 2020Experience Grounds Languagecited by 241
  20. 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
  21. 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 189
  22. 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 150
  23. 2019The Bottom-up Evolution of Representations in the Transformer: A Study with Machine Translation and Language Modeling Objectivescited by 139
  24. 2022Linearly Mapping from Image to Text Spacecited by 139
  25. 2023Hallucination Augmented Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Large Language Modelcited by 119
  26. 2024Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language Modelscited by 115
  27. 2024Interpreting and Editing Vision-Language Representations to Mitigate Hallucinationscited by 103
  28. 2025PerceptionLM: Open-Access Data and Models for Detailed Visual Understandingcited by 88
  29. 2024The Semantic Hub Hypothesis: Language Models Share Semantic Representations Across Languages and Modalitiescited by 69
  30. 2024Cross-modal Information Flow in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 65
  31. 2019Does BERT Make Any Sense? Interpretable Word Sense Disambiguation with Contextualized Embeddingscited by 55
  32. 2024LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Languagecited by 49
  33. 2022MAPL: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of Unimodal Pre-Trained Models for Vision-Language Few-Shot Promptingcited by 41
  34. 2025Same Task, Different Circuits: Disentangling Modality-Specific Mechanisms in VLMscited by 35
  35. 2023Cross-Modal Fine-Tuning: Align then Refinecited by 34
  36. 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spacescited by 32
  37. 2023Do Vision and Language Models Share Concepts? A Vector Space Alignment Studycited by 27
  38. 2025How Visual Representations Map to Language Feature Space in Multimodal LLMscited by 24

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Treat Visual Tokens as Text? But Your MLLM Only Needs Fewer Efforts to See
  2. 2026What Do Visual Tokens Really Encode? Uncovering Sparsity and Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models
  3. 2025Rethinking Visual Token Reduction in LVLMs Under Cross-Modal Misalignment
  4. 2025VScan: Rethinking Visual Token Reduction for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models
  5. 2024ViCToR: Improving Visual Comprehension via Token Reconstruction for Pretraining LMMs
  6. 2025Beyond Intermediate States: Explaining Visual Redundancy through Language
  7. 2023Unified Language-Vision Pretraining in LLM with Dynamic Discrete Visual Tokenization
  8. 2023What Makes for Good Visual Tokenizers for Large Language Models?