Learning Safety-Guaranteed, Non-Greedy Control Barrier Functions Using Reinforcement Learning
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for robot navigation and UAV control
Abstract (arXiv)
Spacecraft rendezvous and proximity operations (RPO) pose safety risks to high-value assets, so formal safety guarantees are critical. Yet conservative safety controllers can reduce mission efficiency. We propose a unified two-stage reinforcement learning (RL) framework that addresses two complementary limitations of Input-Constrained Control Barrier Functions (ICCBFs) for safety-critical, fuel-limited spacecraft control. Given a certified safe set S, ICCBFs guarantee forward invariance of an inner set C* under input bounds, but the resulting per-step quadratic programme (QP) is greedy and fuel-inefficient within C*, and recoverable states outside C* are conservatively discarded. Stage 1 learns state-dependent class-K-infinity parameters that adapt ICCBF/CLF decay rates, embedding long-horizon cost awareness while preserving invariance in C*. Stage 2 learns a residual barrier h_RL(x) that certifies recoverability for a subset of S minus C*. At run time, the controller selects the appropriate barrier formulation (Stage 1 or Stage 2) and solves a lightweight ZOH QP. Both stages are trained with PPO using rewards that penalise constraint violations, control effort, and task metrics. We evaluate three benchmarks: cruise control, spacecraft rendezvous with a rotating target, and inspection that maximises observability subject to keep-in and keep-out zone constraints. Across test cases, the method reduces median fuel relative to ICCBF baselines by 12 to 25 percent and increases the fraction of trajectories that remain in S by 7 to 8 percent, while retaining real-time QP complexity.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for robot navigation and UAV control, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 11 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.
Builds on
11 of 30 references.
References · 11
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2019Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applicationscited by 372
- 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 366
- 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 297
- 2019End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Taskscited by 289
- 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 287
- 2022Safe Control with Learned Certificates: A Survey of Neural Lyapunov, Barrier, and Contraction methodscited by 151
- 2020Safety-Critical Model Predictive Control with Discrete-Time Control Barrier Functioncited by 49
- 2021Safe Control Synthesis via Input Constrained Control Barrier Functionscited by 13
- 2021Enhancing Feasibility and Safety of Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Discrete-Time Control Barrier Functionscited by 11
- 2022Predictive Control Barrier Functions for Online Safety Critical Controlcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Robust and Non-greedy Control Barrier Functions in Spacecraft Proximity Operations
- 2026Safety-Guaranteed Imitation Learning from Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Spacecraft Close Proximity Operations
- 2026SCoCaT: Success Conditioned Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Spacecraft Docking
- 2026Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning for Spacecraft Reorientation with Pointing Keep-Out Constraint
- 2026Safety-Critical Reinforcement Learning with Viability-Based Action Shielding for Hypersonic Longitudinal Flight
- 2025A Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework for Safe and Optimal Control of Autonomous Systems
- 2025Barrier Function Overrides For Non-Convex Fixed Wing Flight Control and Self-Driving Cars
- 2024Sampling-based Safe Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems