Happy Young Women, Grumpy Old Men? Emotion-Driven Demographic Biases in Synthetic Face Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Synthetic faces from text-to-image (T2I) models pervade digital media, yet their demographic biases under emotionally conditioned prompts remain poorly understood. We aim to systematically audit how emotionally conditioned prompts affect demographic and perceived-attractiveness biases in synthetic faces generated by T2I models, with particular attention to intersectional patterns and cross-ecosystem differences across model families. We audited eight (4 Western and 4 Chinese) T2I models and generated 56,000 faces under seven prompt conditions: a neutral baseline and six emotion conditions. We quantified biases in gender, race, age, and perceived attractiveness using information-theoretic divergence metrics. We further conducted intersectional analyses across combined demographic attributes and compared patterns between the Western and Chinese model groups to assess cross-ecosystem consistency and divergence in bias behavior. All models show strong overrepresentation of young faces, and most also overrepresent White-coded individuals. Intersectional analysis reveals compound underrepresentation or near-erasure of specific demographic combinations, such as young x female x Black faces, which are largely absent across models and are not captured by single-attribute audits. Emotion prompts act as additional demographic selectors: negatively valenced emotions (including sadness and fear) consistently shift outputs toward White, middle-aged, male-coded faces. This produces a valence-driven mapping that is also associated with lower perceived attractiveness in generated faces. These findings indicate that demographic bias in T2I face generation is both pervasive and shaped by emotional conditioning. They underscore the need for intersectional, emotion-conditioned, and multilingual demographic audits as part of standard pre-deployment evaluation practices.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2026.
Builds on
37 of 96 references.
References · 37
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,536
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
- 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 326
- 2024Hunyuan-DiT: A Powerful Multi-Resolution Diffusion Transformer with Fine-Grained Chinese Understandingcited by 294
- 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
25 more
- 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
- 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
- 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 225
- 2025SANA 1.5: Efficient Scaling of Training-Time and Inference-Time Compute in Linear Diffusion Transformercited by 165
- 2016Training Deep Networks for Facial Expression Recognition with Crowd-Sourced Label Distributioncited by 158
- 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 152
- 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 124
- 2024FairCLIP: Harnessing Fairness in Vision-Language Learningcited by 69
- 2024Angry Men, Sad Women: Large Language Models Reflect Gendered Stereotypes in Emotion Attributioncited by 39
- 2021One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Visioncited by 33
- 2024Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models at Scale with Counterfactualscited by 27
- 2024Would Deep Generative Models Amplify Bias in Future Models?cited by 24
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
- 2022What-is and How-to for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspectivecited by 18
- 2023Quantifying Bias in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 16
- 2024AI-generated faces influence gender stereotypes and racial homogenizationcited by 13
- 2015Robust Subjective Visual Property Prediction from Crowdsourced Pairwise Labelscited by 12
- 2023Bias and Diversity in Synthetic-based Face Recognitioncited by 11
- 2025Beauty and the Bias: Exploring the Impact of Attractiveness on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2024What is Beautiful is Still Good: The Attractiveness Halo Effect in the era of Beauty Filterscited by 4
- 2024Lookism: The overlooked bias in computer visioncited by 4
- 2025Person-Centric Annotations of LAION-400M: Auditing Bias and Its Transfer to Modelscited by 4
- 2025When Algorithms Play Favorites: Lookism in the Generation and Perception of Facescited by 2
- 2025T2IBias: Uncovering Societal Bias Encoded in the Latent Space of Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 2
- 2026Aesthetics as Structural Harm: Algorithmic Lookism Across Text-to-Image Generation and Classificationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.