mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quantifying Bias in Text-to-Image Generative Models

arXiv 2312.13053 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2023cs.CV cs.CRcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bias in text-to-image (T2I) models can propagate unfair social representations and may be used to aggressively market ideas or push controversial agendas. Existing T2I model bias evaluation methods only focus on social biases. We look beyond that and instead propose an evaluation methodology to quantify general biases in T2I generative models, without any preconceived notions. We assess four state-of-the-art T2I models and compare their baseline bias characteristics to their respective variants (two for each), where certain biases have been intentionally induced. We propose three evaluation metrics to assess model biases including: (i) Distribution bias, (ii) Jaccard hallucination and (iii) Generative miss-rate. We conduct two evaluation studies, modelling biases under general, and task-oriented conditions, using a marketing scenario as the domain for the latter. We also quantify social biases to compare our findings to related works. Finally, our methodology is transferred to evaluate captioned-image datasets and measure their bias. Our approach is objective, domain-agnostic and consistently measures different forms of T2I model biases. We have developed a web application and practical implementation of what has been proposed in this work, which is at https://huggingface.co/spaces/JVice/try-before-you-bias. A video series with demonstrations is available at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk-0xyUyT0MSd_hkp4jQt1Q

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2023.

Builds on

44 of 80 references.

References · 44

  1. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
  6. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
  7. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
  8. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  9. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  10. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  11. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  12. 2020Backdoor Learning: A Surveycited by 426
32 more
  1. 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 377
  2. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 296
  3. 2023Detecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Modelscited by 256
  4. 2022DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 230
  5. 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 226
  6. 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
  7. 2023Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 148
  8. 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
  9. 2022BackdoorBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Backdoor Learningcited by 128
  10. 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
  11. 2023Social Biases through the Text-to-Image Generation Lenscited by 127
  12. 2019Fair Generative Modeling via Weak Supervisioncited by 114
  13. 2022How to Backdoor Diffusion Models?cited by 104
  14. 2023Text-to-Image Diffusion Models can be Easily Backdoored through Multimodal Data Poisoningcited by 92
  15. 2023TrojDiff: Trojan Attacks on Diffusion Models with Diverse Targetscited by 88
  16. 2023ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI modelscited by 86
  17. 2019Design and Evaluation of a Multi-Domain Trojan Detection Method on Deep Neural Networkscited by 71
  18. 2023The Bias Amplification Paradox in Text-to-Image Generationcited by 70
  19. 2023ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generationcited by 64
  20. 2022Rickrolling the Artist: Injecting Backdoors into Text Encoders for Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 59
  21. 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 58
  22. 2023Typology of Risks of Generative Text-to-Image Modelscited by 55
  23. 2023Uncurated Image-Text Datasets: Shedding Light on Demographic Biascited by 52
  24. 2023TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 52
  25. 2021A Step Toward More Inclusive People Annotations for Fairnesscited by 46
  26. 2023BAGM: A Backdoor Attack for Manipulating Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 37
  27. 2022TrojViT: Trojan Insertion in Vision Transformerscited by 31
  28. 2022Bias Mimicking: A Simple Sampling Approach for Bias Mitigationcited by 30
  29. 2022Markedness in Visual Semantic AIcited by 29
  30. 2022VALHALLA: Visual Hallucination for Machine Translationcited by 27
  31. 2022Fair Generative Models via Transfer Learningcited by 27
  32. 2022Generative Bias for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: