Understanding Efficiency: Quantization, Batching, and Serving Strategies in LLM Energy Use
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in production, contributing towards shifting the burden in terms of computational resources and energy demands from training to inference. While prior work has examined the energy cost of inference per prompt or per token, we highlight how system-level design choices - such as numerical precision, batching strategy, and request scheduling - can lead to orders-of-magnitude differences in energy consumption for the same model. We perform a detailed empirical study of LLM inference energy and latency on NVIDIA H100 GPUs, analyzing the impact of quantization, batch size, and serving configuration (e.g., with Hugging Face's Text Generation Inference server). Our results reveal that lower-precision formats only yield energy gains in compute-bound regimes; that batching improves energy efficiency, especially in memory-bound phases like decoding; and that structured request timing (arrival shaping) can reduce per-request energy by up to 100 times. We argue that sustainable LLM deployment depends not only on model internals, but also on the orchestration of the serving stack. Our findings motivate phase-aware energy profiling and system-level optimizations for greener AI services.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
27 of 41 references.
References · 27
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,838
- 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,615
- 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,338
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
- 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 881
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 561
- 2023Splitwise: Efficient generative LLM inference using phase splittingcited by 536
- 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 264
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 246
15 more
- 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
- 2024QServe: W4A8KV4 Quantization and System Co-design for Efficient LLM Servingcited by 200
- 2023Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?cited by 186
- 2023From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inferencecited by 168
- 2023Accelerating LLM Inference with Staged Speculative Decodingcited by 151
- 2024Liger Kernel: Efficient Triton Kernels for LLM Trainingcited by 123
- 2021The Efficiency Misnomercited by 98
- 2024Inducing High Energy-Latency of Large Vision-Language Models with Verbose Imagescited by 69
- 2025Energy Considerations of Large Language Model Inference and Efficiency Optimizationscited by 54
- 2025Sustainable LLM Inference for Edge AI: Evaluating Quantized LLMs for Energy Efficiency, Output Accuracy, and Inference Latencycited by 32
- 2024Offline Energy-Optimal LLM Serving: Workload-Based Energy Models for LLM Inference on Heterogeneous Systemscited by 27
- 2017Minimum Energy Quantized Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2025The Energy Cost of Reasoning: Analyzing Energy Usage in LLMs with Test-time Computecited by 14
- 2024CliqueParcel: An Approach For Batching LLM Prompts That Jointly Optimizes Efficiency And Faithfulnesscited by 12
- 2025Brevity is the soul of sustainability: Characterizing LLM response lengthscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Attention to Detail: Evaluating Energy, Performance, and Accuracy Trade-offs Across vLLM Configurationscited by 1
- 2026The Global Landscape of Environmental AI Regulation: From the Cost of Reasoning to a Right to Green AIcited by 0
- 2026Sample Count Is Not Enough: Candidate-Generation Strategy Shapes the Energy and Performance of LLM Test-Time Scalingcited by 0
- 2026The Right Information Extraction Pipeline Depends on the Document: Accuracy-Energy Trade-offs for Small, Local Modelscited by 0
- 2026The Right Information Extraction Pipeline Depends on the Document: Accuracy-Energy Trade-offs for Small, Local Models25 Sep 2026
- 2026Sample Count Is Not Enough: Candidate-Generation Strategy Shapes the Energy and Performance of LLM Test-Time Scaling16 Sep 2026
- 2026Attention to Detail: Evaluating Energy, Performance, and Accuracy Trade-offs Across vLLM Configurations10 Jul 2026
- 2026The Global Landscape of Environmental AI Regulation: From the Cost of Reasoning to a Right to Green AI10 Feb 2026