mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Brevity is the soul of sustainability: Characterizing LLM response lengths

arXiv 2506.08686 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.CYcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A significant portion of the energy consumed by Large Language Models (LLMs) arises from their inference processes; hence developing energy-efficient methods for inference is crucial. While several techniques exist for inference optimization, output compression remains relatively unexplored, with only a few preliminary efforts addressing this aspect. In this work, we first benchmark 12 decoder-only LLMs across 5 datasets, revealing that these models often produce responses that are substantially longer than necessary. We then conduct a comprehensive quality assessment of LLM responses, formally defining six information categories present in LLM responses. We show that LLMs often tend to include redundant or additional information besides the minimal answer. To address this issue of long responses by LLMs, we explore several simple and intuitive prompt-engineering strategies. Empirical evaluation shows that appropriate prompts targeting length reduction and controlling information content can achieve significant energy optimization between 25-60% by reducing the response length while preserving the quality of LLM responses.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  2. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
  3. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  4. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  5. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,838
  6. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,615
  7. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  8. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 791
  9. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
  10. 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 590
  11. 2023LongLLMLingua: Accelerating and Enhancing LLMs in Long Context Scenarios via Prompt Compressioncited by 443
  12. 2023Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?cited by 186
7 more
  1. 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 183
  2. 2024Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Eracited by 97
  3. 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Surveycited by 91
  4. 2019TWEETQA: A Social Media Focused Question Answering Datasetcited by 55
  5. 2021GooAQ: Open Question Answering with Diverse Answer Typescited by 53
  6. 2023How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and reviewcited by 34
  7. 2024Toward Sustainable GenAI using Generation Directives for Carbon-Friendly Large Language Model Inferencecited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.