Characterizing the Effect of Noise in Language Generation in the Limit
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Kleinberg and Mullainathan recently proposed a formal framework for studying the phenomenon of language generation, called language generation in the limit. In this model, an adversary gives an enumeration of example strings from an unknown target language, and the algorithm is tasked with correctly generating unseen strings from the target language within finite time. Refined notions of non-uniform and uniform generation were later introduced by Li, Raman, and Tewari (2025), and a noisy model was introduced by Raman and Raman (2025), which allows the adversary to insert extraneous strings. A natural question in the noisy model is to quantify the effect of noise, by studying the impact of each additional extraneous string. We show two complementary results in this setting. We first show that for both uniform and non-uniform generation, a single noisy string strictly reduces the set of collections that can be generated, thus answering an open question in Raman and Raman (2025). Then, we show for both uniform and non-uniform generation that generation with a single noisy string is equivalent to generation with any finite amount of noise, sharply contrasting with the strict hierarchy for noisy generation in the limit shown by Bai, Panigrahi, and Zhang (2026). Finally, we leverage our previous results to provide the first known characterization for non-uniform noise-dependent generatability.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
20 of 37 references.
References · 20
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 417
- 2023Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinatecited by 114
- 2024Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Modelcited by 107
- 2024Language Generation in the Limitcited by 39
- 2024Generation through the lens of learning theorycited by 30
- 2024Exploring Facets of Language Generation in the Limitcited by 27
- 2025Density Measures for Language Generationcited by 20
- 2025Generation from Noisy Examplescited by 19
- 2025Representative Language Generationcited by 18
8 more
- 2025On Union-Closedness of Language Generationcited by 17
- 2025Language Generation in the Limit: Noise, Loss, and Feedbackcited by 15
- 2024On Characterizations for Language Generation: Interplay of Hallucinations, Breadth, and Stabilitycited by 13
- 2025Language Generation and Identification From Partial Enumeration: Tight Density Bounds and Topological Characterizationscited by 13
- 2025Pareto-optimal Non-uniform Language Generationcited by 10
- 2025A Characterization of List Language Identification in the Limitcited by 9
- 2025Language Generation: Complexity Barriers and Implications for Learningcited by 9
- 2026Safe Language Generation in the Limitcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Contrastive Identification and Generation in the Limitcited by 3
- 2026On the Price of Privacy for Language Identification and Generationcited by 2
- 2026Hallucination Rates in Language Generationcited by 0
- 2026GenLimitLib: A Formal Library for Language Generation in the Limit and AI-Assisted Mathematical Researchcited by 0
- 2026GenLimitLib: A Formal Library for Language Generation in the Limit and AI-Assisted Mathematical Research29 Sep 2026
- 2026Hallucination Rates in Language Generation25 Jul 2026
- 2026Contrastive Identification and Generation in the Limit7 May 2026
- 2026On the Price of Privacy for Language Identification and Generation8 Apr 2026