Collocational bootstrapping: A hypothesis about the learning of subject-verb agreement in humans and neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In what ways might statistical signals in linguistic input assist with the acquisition of syntax? Here we hypothesize a mechanism called collocational bootstrapping, in which regularities in word co-occurrence patterns can provide cues to syntactic dependencies. We investigate whether this mechanism can support the acquisition of English subject-verb agreement. First, we simulate language acquisition by training neural networks on synthetic datasets that vary in how predictable their subject-verb pairings are. We find that there is a range of variability levels at which these statistical learners robustly learn subject-verb agreement. We then analyze the variability of subject-verb pairings in child-directed language, and we find that the variability in such data falls within the range that supported robust generalization in our computational simulations. Taken together, these results suggest that collocational bootstrapping is a viable learning strategy for the type of input that children receive.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
16 of 50 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
- 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 239
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 191
- 2020Does syntax need to grow on trees? Sources of hierarchical inductive bias in sequence-to-sequence networkscited by 72
- 2024Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNscited by 65
- 2021Frequency Effects on Syntactic Rule Learning in Transformerscited by 59
- 2018Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of LSTMs to Understand Negative Polarity Itemscited by 36
- 2024Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidencecited by 35
4 more
- 2022Coloring the Blank Slate: Pre-training Imparts a Hierarchical Inductive Bias to Sequence-to-sequence Modelscited by 28
- 2024Manipulating language models' training data to study syntactic constraint learning: the case of English passivizationcited by 12
- 2025Child-Directed Language Does Not Consistently Boost Syntax Learning in Language Modelscited by 9
- 2026Function Words as Statistical Cues for Language Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.