mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Contextual Runtime Monitors for Safe AI-Based Autonomy

arXiv 2601.20666 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a novel framework for learning context-aware runtime monitors for AI-based control ensembles. Machine-learning (ML) controllers are increasingly deployed in (autonomous) cyber-physical systems because of their ability to solve complex decision-making tasks. However, their accuracy can degrade sharply in unfamiliar environments, creating significant safety concerns. Traditional ensemble methods aim to improve robustness by averaging or voting across multiple controllers, yet this often dilutes the specialized strengths that individual controllers exhibit in different operating contexts. We argue that, rather than blending controller outputs, a monitoring framework should identify and exploit these contextual strengths. In this paper, we reformulate the design of safe AI-based control ensembles as a contextual monitoring problem. A monitor continuously observes the system's context and selects the controller best suited to the current conditions. To achieve this, we cast monitor learning as a contextual learning task and draw on techniques from contextual multi-armed bandits. Our approach comes with two key benefits: (1) theoretical safety guarantees during controller selection, and (2) improved utilization of controller diversity. We validate our framework in two simulated autonomous driving scenarios, demonstrating significant improvements in both safety and performance compared to non-contextual baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.

Builds on

22 of 49 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  2. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  3. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  4. 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
  5. 2018Deep Bayesian Bandits Showdown: An Empirical Comparison of Bayesian Deep Networks for Thompson Samplingcited by 166
  6. 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 117
  7. 2018Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Scene Generationcited by 79
  8. 2023The Safety Filter: A Unified View of Safety-Critical Control in Autonomous Systemscited by 77
  9. 2020Neural Contextual Bandits with Deep Representation and Shallow Explorationcited by 71
  10. 2019Randomized Exploration in Generalized Linear Banditscited by 70
  11. 2024Active Preference Optimization for Sample Efficient RLHFcited by 61
  12. 2022Jointly Efficient and Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 41
10 more
  1. 2016Towards Verified Artificial Intelligencecited by 36
  2. 2023Improved Regret Bounds of (Multinomial) Logistic Bandits via Regret-to-Confidence-Set Conversioncited by 24
  3. 2019Formal Synthesis of Stochastic Systems via Control Barrier Certificatescited by 21
  4. 2020Formal Analysis and Redesign of a Neural Network-Based Aircraft Taxiing System with VerifAIcited by 21
  5. 2023Pure Exploration in Bandits with Linear Constraintscited by 10
  6. 2023SMARLA: A Safety Monitoring Approach for Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 9
  7. 2024Autonomous Driving With Perception Uncertainties: Deep-Ensemble Based Adaptive Cruise Controlcited by 5
  8. 2019Dynamic-Weighted Simplex Strategy for Learning Enabled Cyber Physical Systemscited by 4
  9. 2024Sketch and Refine: Towards Fast and Accurate Lane Detectioncited by 3
  10. 2024An Efficient Risk-aware Branch MPC for Automated Driving that is Robust to Uncertain Vehicle Behaviorscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.