AgenticSCR: An Autonomous Agentic Secure Code Review for Immature Vulnerabilities Detection
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Secure code review is critical during pre-integration, where Atlassian developers rely on lightweight analysis tools, while deep security assessment is deferred to later stages, delaying feedback and increasing remediation costs. Existing static analyzers are often noisy and struggle with context-dependent or partially manifested vulnerabilities, while static large language model (LLM) reviewers are constrained by context windows and lack tool interaction. Agentic AI, which combines LLMs with code navigation, shows promise; however, its effectiveness for early-stage secure code review remains underexplored. We present AgenticSCR, an agentic secure code reviewer augmented with security-focused semantic memory that grounds reasoning in structured security knowledge to detect vulnerabilities before they fully manifest. AgenticSCR achieves at least 153% relative improvement in generating comments with correct localization, vulnerability type, and relevance over static LLM baseline, multi-agent reviewer, and SAST tools. In a shadow deployment, 54% of its comments were validated by security engineers for developer reporting, demonstrating practical utility while underscoring the difficulty of the task. These findings position the security-focused semantic memory as a promising direction for agentic secure code review, enabling early-stage vulnerability identification. Our approach builds an important step toward reliable localization, detection, and explanation in shift-left security practices
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 25 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2026.
Builds on
25 of 55 references.
References · 25
- 2020CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languagescited by 1,286
- 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 581
- 2025AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challengescited by 167
- 2021Towards Automating Code Review Activitiescited by 54
- 2023ChatGPT for Vulnerability Detection, Classification, and Repair: How Far Are We?cited by 44
- 2024CodeAgent: Autonomous Communicative Agents for Code Reviewcited by 33
- 2025BitsAI-CR: Automated Code Review via LLM in Practicecited by 22
- 2024An Empirical Study of Static Analysis Tools for Secure Code Reviewcited by 17
- 2021JITLine: A Simpler, Better, Faster, Finer-grained Just-In-Time Defect Predictioncited by 14
- 2019Similarity-based Android Malware Detection Using Hamming Distance of Static Binary Featurescited by 8
- 2023Code-centric Learning-based Just-In-Time Vulnerability Detectioncited by 8
- 2025LAURA: Enhancing Code Review Generation with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented LLMcited by 8
13 more
- 2024Prompting and Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Automated Code Review Comment Generationcited by 7
- 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Code Reviewcited by 7
- 2022Less is More: Supporting Developers in Vulnerability Detection during Code Reviewcited by 6
- 2026RovoDev Code Reviewer: A Large-Scale Online Evaluation of LLM-based Code Review Automation at Atlassiancited by 6
- 2021Why Security Defects Go Unnoticed during Code Reviews? A Case-Control Study of the Chromium OS Projectcited by 5
- 2023Toward Effective Secure Code Reviews: An Empirical Study of Security-Related Coding Weaknessescited by 5
- 2025CodeFuse-CR-Bench: A Comprehensiveness-aware Benchmark for End-to-End Code Review Evaluation in Python Projectscited by 5
- 2025iCodeReviewer: Improving Secure Code Review with Mixture of Promptscited by 5
- 2025SecureReviewer: Enhancing Large Language Models for Secure Code Review through Secure-aware Fine-tuningcited by 5
- 2025Code Review Comprehension: Reviewing Strategies Seen Through Code Comprehension Theoriescited by 4
- 2024Hierarchical Tree-structured Knowledge Graph For Academic Insight Surveycited by 3
- 2025Toward Realistic Evaluations of Just-In-Time Vulnerability Predictioncited by 3
- 2021Why Don't Developers Detect Improper Input Validation?'; DROP TABLE Papers; --cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Code-Augur: Agentic Vulnerability Detection via Specification Inference
- 2026Verify Before You Fix: Agentic Execution Grounding for Trustworthy Cross-Language Code Analysis
- 2025SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks
- 2026CVE-Factory: Scaling Expert-Level Agentic Tasks for Code Security Vulnerability
- 2025Breaking the Code: Security Assessment of AI Code Agents Through Systematic Jailbreaking Attacks
- 2026SoK: AI Secure Code Generation: Progress, Pitfalls, and Paths Forward
- 2024AutoSafeCoder: A Multi-Agent Framework for Securing LLM Code Generation through Static Analysis and Fuzz Testing
- 2026AgenticVM: Agentic AI for Adaptive Software Vulnerability Management