mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BitsAI-CR: Automated Code Review via LLM in Practice

arXiv 2501.15134 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2025cs.SEcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Code review remains a critical yet resource-intensive process in software development, particularly challenging in large-scale industrial environments. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for automating code review, existing solutions face significant limitations in precision and practicality. This paper presents BitsAI-CR, an innovative framework that enhances code review through a two-stage approach combining RuleChecker for initial issue detection and ReviewFilter for precision verification. The system is built upon a comprehensive taxonomy of review rules and implements a data flywheel mechanism that enables continuous performance improvement through structured feedback and evaluation metrics. Our approach introduces an Outdated Rate metric that can reflect developers' actual adoption of review comments, enabling automated evaluation and systematic optimization at scale. Empirical evaluation demonstrates BitsAI-CR's effectiveness, achieving 75.0% precision in review comment generation. For the Go language which has predominant usage at ByteDance, we maintain an Outdated Rate of 26.7%. The system has been successfully deployed at ByteDance, serving over 12,000 Weekly Active Users (WAU). Our work provides valuable insights into the practical application of automated code review and offers a blueprint for organizations seeking to implement automated code reviews at scale.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 17.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025P2P: Automated Paper-to-Poster Generation and Fine-Grained Benchmarkcited by 15
  2. 2026AACR-Bench: Evaluating Automatic Code Review with Holistic Repository-Level Contextcited by 5
  3. 2025Issue-Oriented Agent-Based Framework for Automated Review Comment Generationcited by 4
  4. 2026SWE-Review: Closing the Loop on Issue Resolution with Agentic Code Reviewcited by 4
  5. 2025Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 3
  6. 2026Sphinx: Benchmarking and Modeling for LLM-Driven Pull Request Reviewcited by 3
  7. 2026CTFExplorer: Evaluating LLM Offensive Agents Through Multi-Target Web CTF Benchmarkingcited by 3
  8. 2026Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Reviewcited by 3
  9. 2026AgenticSCR: An Autonomous Agentic Secure Code Review for Immature Vulnerabilities Detectioncited by 2
  10. 2025Fine-Tuning LLMs to Analyze Multiple Dimensions of Code Review: A Maximum Entropy Regulated Long Chain-of-Thought Approachcited by 1
  11. 2026Tracing Stereotypes in Pre-trained Transformers: From Biased Neurons to Fairer Modelscited by 1
  12. 2026Understanding the Limits of Automated Evaluation for Code Review Bots in Practicecited by 1
10 more
  1. 2026Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Reviewcited by 1
  2. 2026SEVRA-BENCH: Social Engineering of Vulnerabilities in Review Agentscited by 1
  3. 2025BitsAI-Fix: LLM-Driven Approach for Automated Lint Error Resolution in Practicecited by 0
  4. 2026ConceptRM: The Quest to Mitigate Alert Fatigue through Consensus-Based Purity-Driven Data Cleaning for Reflection Modellingcited by 0
  5. 2026Learning From Developers: Towards Reliable Patch Validation at Scale for Linuxcited by 0
  6. 2026Archer: Towards Agentic Review for Compiler Optimizationscited by 0
  7. 2026Evaluating the Impact of Explainable AI on Trust in AI-Assisted Code Reviewcited by 0
  8. 2026Evaluation Pitfalls and Sparsity Limitations in LLM-based Confidence Estimates for Classificationcited by 0
  9. 2026From Static to Dynamic: Benchmarking Real-World Code Review with MCR-Benchcited by 0
  10. 2026Using Agentic AI for contextualized and multifaceted code review at Ericssoncited by 0