mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Code-Augur: Agentic Vulnerability Detection via Specification Inference

arXiv 2606.18619 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.SEcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of agentic vulnerability detection is already becoming a watershed moment for software security. Audits conducted entirely by autonomous LLM agents are uncovering critical vulnerabilities in fundamental software underpinning digital society. Many of these vulnerabilities remained masked for years, surfacing only now with AI agents. Yet the reasoning behind these discoveries remains alarmingly opaque and unvalidated. What assumptions did the agent make about a function's inputs when it deemed that function to be secure? Failures in reasoning and incorrect assumptions can lead to missed vulnerabilities and reduce trust in agentic analysis. We propose a security-specification-first paradigm that (1) exposes the agent's tacit assumptions explicitly as security specifications and (2) continuously refines those specifications via runtime falsification. We realize our approach in Code-Augur, a novel harness for agentic vulnerability detection. Given a codebase, Code-Augur analyzes each component of the system for vulnerable code. When it deems a component to be secure, it commits the local invariants behind that judgment as in-source assertions. In parallel, Code-Augur leverages a guided fuzzer to attempt to falsify those assumptions. When the fuzzer triggers an assertion, this either reveals a genuine vulnerability or a flawed specification to refine. In both cases, this process grounds the agent's understanding, aligning its view of code intent with how the code actually behaves. On real-world subjects, Code-Augur effectively leverages security specifications to detect more vulnerabilities than other state-of-the-art agents. Additionally, Code-Augur found 22 new vulnerabilities in key open-source projects. Compared to curated specialized models like Claude Mythos, Code-Augur offers effective agentic vulnerability detection built on widely available LLMs like Sonnet and DeepSeek.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025VulAgent: Hypothesis-Validation based Multi-Agent Vulnerability Detection15 Sep

Other references · 16

  1. 2024IRIS: LLM-Assisted Static Analysis for Detecting Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 103
  2. 2023Fuzz4All: Universal Fuzzing with Large Language Modelscited by 88
  3. 2024SpecRover: Code Intent Extraction via LLMscited by 72
  4. 2024Vul-RAG: Enhancing LLM-based Vulnerability Detection via Knowledge-level RAGcited by 68
  5. 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Natural Language Intent into Formal Method Postconditions?cited by 57
  6. 2024SpecGen: Automated Generation of Formal Program Specifications via Large Language Modelscited by 53
  7. 2023Large Language Model-Powered Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection: New Perspectivescited by 48
  8. 2023Prompt Fuzzing for Fuzz Driver Generationcited by 27
  9. 2024Evaluating LLM-driven User-Intent Formalization for Verification-Aware Languagescited by 16
  10. 2025Locus: Agentic Predicate Synthesis for Directed Fuzzingcited by 9
  11. 2025ATLANTIS: AI-driven Threat Localization, Analysis, and Triage Intelligence Systemcited by 9
  12. 2026SoK: DARPA's AI Cyber Challenge (AIxCC): Competition Design, Architectures, and Lessons Learnedcited by 9
4 more
  1. 2025All You Need Is A Fuzzing Brain: An LLM-Powered System for Automated Vulnerability Detection and Patchingcited by 6
  2. 2026FM-Agent: Scaling Formal Methods to Large Systems via LLM-Based Hoare-Style Reasoningcited by 6
  3. 2026OSS-CRS: Liberating AIxCC Cyber Reasoning Systems for Real-World Open-Source Securitycited by 2
  4. 2026Agentic Fuzzing: Opportunities and Challengescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026CLEAR: Causal Context-Based Agentic Reasoning for Vulnerability Detection
  2. 2026When Passing Tests Hides Vulnerabilities: An Empirical Study of Silent Failures in Agentic Systems
  3. 2026FuzzingBrain V2: A Multi-Agent LLM System for Automated Vulnerability Discovery and Reproduction
  4. 2026AgenticSCR: An Autonomous Agentic Secure Code Review for Immature Vulnerabilities Detection
  5. 2024AutoSafeCoder: A Multi-Agent Framework for Securing LLM Code Generation through Static Analysis and Fuzz Testing
  6. 2026AgenticVM: Agentic AI for Adaptive Software Vulnerability Management
  7. 2026Antaeus: Hunting Repository-Level Logic Vulnerabilities via Context-Grounded LLM Reasoning ↗
  8. 2026Cheap to Hypothesize, Costly to Verify: The Defense Surface of Agentic Vulnerability Discovery