mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automated structural testing of LLM-based agents: methods, framework, and case studies

arXiv 2601.18827 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based agents are rapidly being adopted across diverse domains. Since they interact with users without supervision, they must be tested extensively. Current testing approaches focus on acceptance-level evaluation from the user's perspective. While intuitive, these tests require manual evaluation, are difficult to automate, do not facilitate root cause analysis, and incur expensive test environments. In this paper, we present methods to enable structural testing of LLM-based agents. Our approach utilizes traces (based on OpenTelemetry) to capture agent trajectories, employs mocking to enforce reproducible LLM behavior, and adds assertions to automate test verification. This enables testing agent components and interactions at a deeper technical level within automated workflows. We demonstrate how structural testing enables the adaptation of software engineering best practices to agents, including the test automation pyramid, regression testing, test-driven development, and multi-language testing. In representative case studies, we demonstrate automated execution and faster root-cause analysis. Collectively, these methods reduce testing costs and improve agent quality through higher coverage, reusability, and earlier defect detection. We provide an open source reference implementation on GitHub.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 33 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2026.

Builds on

33 of 80 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
  2. 2024Defining and Detecting the Defects of the Large Language Model-based Autonomous Agents24 Dec
  3. 2024From LLMs to LLM-based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey of Current, Challenges and Future5 Aug

Other references · 30

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  5. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  6. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  7. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  8. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  9. 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 752
  10. 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
  11. 2025LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversationcited by 400
  12. 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 329
18 more
  1. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 266
  2. 2025Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agentscited by 190
  3. 2023Evil Geniuses: Delving into the Safety of LLM-based Agentscited by 103
  4. 2024A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Modelscited by 95
  5. 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 83
  6. 2024LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With Thiscited by 77
  7. 2024TrustAgent: Towards Safe and Trustworthy LLM-based Agentscited by 62
  8. 2022Can Large Language Models Truly Understand Prompts? A Case Study with Negated Promptscited by 56
  9. 2025One Token to Fool LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 56
  10. 2024Test-Driven Development for Code Generationcited by 32
  11. 2023Software Testing of Generative AI Systems: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 6
  12. 2022Automatic Creation of Acceptance Tests by Extracting Conditionals from Requirements: NLP Approach and Case Studycited by 3
  13. 2022Open Tracing Tools: Overview and Critical Comparisoncited by 3
  14. 2024Generative AI for Test Driven Development: Preliminary Resultscited by 3
  15. 2020Software Test Automation Maturity -- A Survey of the State of the Practicecited by 2
  16. 2024Generative AI Toolkit -- a framework for increasing the quality of LLM-based applications over their whole life cyclecited by 2
  17. 2020Why Research on Test-Driven Development is Inconclusive?cited by 1
  18. 2021Causal Factors, Benefits and Challenges of Test-Driven Development: Practitioner Perceptionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Tangent: An Empirical Study of Testing Practices for LLM-Based Agent Applications
  2. 2026Complex Agents, Shallow Tests: Demystifying and Enhancing Test Adequacy of Agent Harness in the Wild
  3. 2025Benchmarking and Studying the LLM-based Agent System in End-to-End Software Development
  4. 2024The Potential of LLMs in Automating Software Testing: From Generation to Reporting
  5. 2026Grounding AI Agents in Contracts: An Empirical Evaluation of Spec-Driven Test Generation
  6. 2026Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration for Unit Test Generation via Human-Testing-Inspired Workflows
  7. 2026Rethinking the Value of Agent-Generated Tests for LLM-Based Software Engineering Agents
  8. 2026Agentic CLEAR: Automating Multi-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents