Open Tracing Tools: Overview and Critical Comparison
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background. Coping with the rapid growing complexity in contemporary software architecture, tracing has become an increasingly critical practice and been adopted widely by software engineers. By adopting tracing tools, practitioners are able to monitor, debug, and optimize distributed software architectures easily. However, with excessive number of valid candidates, researchers and practitioners have a hard time finding and selecting the suitable tracing tools by systematically considering their features and advantages.Objective. To such a purpose, this paper aims to provide an overview of popular Open tracing tools via comparison. Method. Herein, we first identified ra30 tools in an objective, systematic, and reproducible manner adopting the Systematic Multivocal Literature Review protocol. Then, we characterized each tool looking at the 1) measured features, 2) popularity both in peer-reviewed literature and online media, and 3) benefits and issues. We used topic modeling and sentiment analysis to extract and summarize the benefits and issues. Specially, we adopted ChatGPT to support the topic interpretation. Results. As a result, this paper presents a systematic comparison amongst the selected tracing tools in terms of their features, popularity, benefits and issues. Conclusion. The result mainly shows that each tracing tool provides a unique combination of features with also different pros and cons. The contribution of this paper is to provide the practitioners better understanding of the tracing tools facilitating their adoption.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024The emergence of Large Language Models (LLM) as a tool in literature reviews: an LLM automated systematic reviewcited by 20
- 2026Automated structural testing of LLM-based agents: methods, framework, and case studiescited by 3
- 2025How Metacognitive Architectures Remember Their Own Thoughts: A Systematic Reviewcited by 2
- 2026Automated structural testing of LLM-based agents: methods, framework, and case studies25 Jan 2026
- 2025How Metacognitive Architectures Remember Their Own Thoughts: A Systematic Review28 Feb 2025
- 2024The emergence of Large Language Models (LLM) as a tool in literature reviews: an LLM automated systematic review6 Sep 2024