mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SAGE: Steerable Agentic Data Generation for Deep Search with Execution Feedback

arXiv 2601.18202 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep search agents, which aim to answer complex questions requiring reasoning across multiple documents, can significantly speed up the information-seeking process. Collecting human annotations for this application is prohibitively expensive due to long and complex exploration trajectories. We propose an agentic pipeline that automatically generates high quality, difficulty-controlled deep search question-answer pairs for a given corpus and a target difficulty level. Our pipeline, SAGE, consists of a data generator which proposes QA pairs and a search agent which attempts to solve the generated question and provide execution feedback for the data generator. The two components interact over multiple rounds to iteratively refine the question-answer pairs until they satisfy the target difficulty level. Our intrinsic evaluation shows SAGE generates questions that require diverse reasoning strategies, while significantly increases the correctness and difficulty of the generated data. Our extrinsic evaluation demonstrates up to 23% relative performance gain on popular deep search benchmarks by training deep search agents with our synthetic data. Additional experiments show that agents trained on our data can adapt from fixed-corpus retrieval to Google Search at inference time, without further training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 33 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.

Builds on

33 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025DeepDive: Advancing Deep Search Agents with Knowledge Graphs and Multi-Turn RL12 Sep
  2. 2025WebExplorer: Explore and Evolve for Training Long-Horizon Web Agents8 Sep
  3. 2025BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent8 Aug
  4. 2025WebSailor: Navigating Super-human Reasoning for Web Agent3 Jul
  5. 2025WebDancer: Towards Autonomous Information Seeking Agency28 May
  6. 2025Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Models9 Jan
  7. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents25 Jul

Other references · 26

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  6. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  7. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  8. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  9. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  10. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  11. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  12. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
14 more
  1. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  2. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
  3. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
  4. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  5. 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 911
  6. 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 893
  7. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
  8. 2017SearchQA: A New Q&A Dataset Augmented with Context from a Search Enginecited by 221
  9. 2024Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 158
  10. 2025WebShaper: Agentically Data Synthesizing via Information-Seeking Formalizationcited by 118
  11. 2025A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agentscited by 104
  12. 2024RAG-QA Arena: Evaluating Domain Robustness for Long-form Retrieval Augmented Question Answeringcited by 43
  13. 2025DeepDiver: Adaptive Search Intensity Scaling via Open-Web Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  14. 2025WebMall -- A Multi-Shop Benchmark for Evaluating Web Agentscited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agents
  2. 2025Synthesizing Agentic Data for Web Agents with Progressive Difficulty Enhancement Mechanisms
  3. 2025From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents
  4. 2026Agentic-R: Learning to Retrieve for Agentic Search
  5. 2026Question's Gambit: The First Move Matters in Agentic Deep Search
  6. 2025InfoAgent: Advancing Autonomous Information-Seeking Agents
  7. 2026SAGE: Benchmarking and Improving Retrieval for Deep Research Agents
  8. 2026ORBIT: Scalable and Verifiable Data Generation for Search Agents on a Tight Budget