mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What can we learn from Data Leakage and Unlearning for Law?

arXiv 2307.10476 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2023cs.CR cs.CLcited by 15

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have a privacy concern because they memorize training data (including personally identifiable information (PII) like emails and phone numbers) and leak it during inference. A company can train an LLM on its domain-customized data which can potentially also include their users' PII. In order to comply with privacy laws such as the "right to be forgotten", the data points of users that are most vulnerable to extraction could be deleted. We find that once the most vulnerable points are deleted, a new set of points become vulnerable to extraction. So far, little attention has been given to understanding memorization for fine-tuned models. In this work, we also show that not only do fine-tuned models leak their training data but they also leak the pre-training data (and PII) memorized during the pre-training phase. The property of new data points becoming vulnerable to extraction after unlearning and leakage of pre-training data through fine-tuned models can pose significant privacy and legal concerns for companies that use LLMs to offer services. We hope this work will start an interdisciplinary discussion within AI and law communities regarding the need for policies to tackle these issues.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2023.

Builds on

16 of 30 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  3. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  4. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  5. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
  6. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
  7. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  8. 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 314
  9. 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 285
  10. 2022Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information?cited by 200
  11. 2022Quantifying Privacy Risks of Masked Language Models Using Membership Inference Attackscited by 175
  12. 2023Emergent and Predictable Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 148
4 more
  1. 2022The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relativecited by 136
  2. 2021Does BERT Pretrained on Clinical Notes Reveal Sensitive Data?cited by 93
  3. 2022Neuro-Symbolic Language Modeling with Automaton-augmented Retrievalcited by 60
  4. 2023Machine Learning Model Attribution Challengecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 9; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Unintended Memorization of Sensitive Information in Fine-Tuned Language Models
  2. 2024Preserving Privacy in Large Language Models: A Survey on Current Threats and Solutions
  3. 2025Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language Models
  4. 2024The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models
  5. 2025Unlearning Imperative: Securing Trustworthy and Responsible LLMs through Engineered Forgetting
  6. 2025A Survey on Privacy Risks and Protection in Large Language Models
  7. 2025Does Machine Unlearning Truly Remove Knowledge?
  8. 2025The Landscape of Memorization in LLMs: Mechanisms, Measurement, and Mitigation