Latent-Space Contrastive Reinforcement Learning for Stable and Efficient LLM Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance in surface-level text generation, their nature in handling complex multi-step reasoning tasks often remains one of ``statistical fitting'' rather than systematic logical deduction. Traditional Reinforcement Learning (RL) attempts to mitigate this by introducing a ``think-before-speak'' paradigm. However, applying RL directly in high-dimensional, discrete token spaces faces three inherent challenges: sample-inefficient rollouts, high gradient estimation variance, and the risk of catastrophic forgetting. To fundamentally address these structural bottlenecks, we propose DeepLatent Reasoning (DLR), a latent-space bidirectional contrastive reinforcement learning framework. This framework shifts the trial-and-error cost from expensive token-level full sequence generation to the continuous latent manifold. Specifically, we introduce a lightweight assistant model to efficiently sample K reasoning chain encodings within the latent space. These encodings are filtered via a dual reward mechanism based on correctness and formatting; only high-value latent trajectories are fed into a frozen main model for single-pass decoding. To maximize reasoning diversity while maintaining coherence, we design a contrastive learning objective to enable directed exploration within the latent space. Since the main model parameters remain frozen during optimization, this method mathematically eliminates catastrophic forgetting. Experiments demonstrate that under comparable GPU computational budgets, DLR achieves more stable training convergence, supports longer-horizon reasoning chains, and facilitates the sustainable accumulation of reasoning capabilities, providing a viable path toward reliable and scalable reinforcement learning for LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.
Builds on
9 of 11 references.
References · 9
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 754
- 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 447
- 2019Go-Explore: a New Approach for Hard-Exploration Problemscited by 212
- 2018Large Margin Deep Networks for Classificationcited by 112
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026LaDi-RL: Latent Diffusion Reasoning Prevents Entropy Collapse in Reinforcement Learning
- 2026DLWM: Diverse Latent World Models for Efficient Multimodal Reasoning
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Latent-Space Thinking in LLMs
- 2025Learning When to Stop: Adaptive Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026HyLaR: Hybrid Latent Reasoning with Decoupled Policy Optimization
- 2025Hybrid Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Seek in the Dark: Reasoning via Test-Time Instance-Level Policy Gradient in Latent Space
- 2025Reasoning Palette: Modulating Reasoning via Latent Contextualization for Controllable Exploration for (V)LMs