mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reinforcement Learning for Latent-Space Thinking in LLMs

arXiv 2512.11816 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning typically utilizes the discrete language space for thinking, which is inherently inefficient, as many generated tokens only enforce linguistic rules that are not required for reasoning. To bypass this, latent-space thinking allows models to think using the continuous embedding space. While existing methods for training those models show domain-specific gains, they fail to maintain performance in complex tasks, such as mathematical reasoning. We experimentally demonstrate that the Coconut approach, a form of supervised fine-tuning for latent-space thinking, is highly sensitive to design choices and exhibits several inherent limitations. To address these issues, we investigate reinforcement learning (RL) techniques -- an underexplored direction in latent-space thinking -- including GRPO and design a novel Latent RL method for directly optimizing the latent thinking steps. Our experimental results reveal that these RL-trained models still lag behind traditional language-space CoT models in the mathematical reasoning domain. We make our codebase publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2025.

Builds on

14 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Reasoning by Superposition: A Theoretical Perspective on Chain of Continuous Thought18 May
  2. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space9 Dec
  3. 2024From Explicit CoT to Implicit CoT: Learning to Internalize CoT Step by Step23 May
  4. 2024Let's Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Models24 Apr

Other references · 10

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  6. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
  7. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  8. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  9. 2023Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokenscited by 264
  10. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Small LLMs: What Works and What Doesn'tcited by 74

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Latent Reasoning with Supervised Thinking States
  2. 2025CTRLS: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Latent State-Transition
  3. 2025Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs
  4. 2026Prioritize the Process, Not Just the Outcome: Rewarding Latent Thought Trajectories Improves Reasoning in Looped Language Models
  5. 2025Why Does Reasoning Length Converge? Unveiling the Underfitting-Overfitting Trade-off in Chain-of-Thought
  6. 2025Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  7. 2024RL-STaR: Theoretical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Frameworks for Self-Taught Reasoner
  8. 2025Mind the Gap: Bridging Thought Leap for Improved Chain-of-Thought Tuning