mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Generalization and Uncertainty Quantification of Photometric Redshift Models

arXiv 2601.17222 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2026astro-ph.IM astro-ph.CO cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate redshift estimates are a vital component in understanding galaxy evolution and precision cosmology. In this paper, we explore approaches to increase the applicability of machine learning models for photometric redshift estimation on a broader range of galaxy types. Typical models are trained with ground-truth redshifts from spectroscopy. We test the utility and effectiveness of two approaches for combining spectroscopic redshifts and redshifts derived from multiband (~35 filters) photometry, which sample different types of galaxies compared to spectroscopic surveys. The two approaches are (1) training on a composite dataset and (2) transfer learning from one dataset to another. We compile photometric redshifts from the COSMOS2020 catalog (TransferZ) to complement an established spectroscopic redshift dataset (GalaxiesML). We used two architectures, deterministic neural networks (NN) and Bayesian neural networks (BNN), to examine and evaluate their performance with respect to the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) photo-z science requirements. We also use split conformal prediction for calibrating uncertainty estimates and producing prediction intervals for the BNN and NN, respectively. We find that a NN trained on a composite dataset predicts photo-z's that are 4.5 times less biased within the redshift range 0.3<z<1.5, 1.1 times less scattered, and has a 1.4 times lower outlier rate than a model trained on only spectroscopic ground truths. We also find that BNNs produce reliable uncertainty estimates, but are sensitive to the different ground truths. This investigation leverages different sources of ground truths to develop models that can accurately predict photo-z's for a broader population of galaxies crucial for surveys such as Euclid and LSST.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2026.

Builds on

10 of 82 references.

References · 10

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
  3. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 664
  4. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 629
  5. 2017TensorFlow Distributionscited by 106
  6. 2014Regression Conformal Prediction with Nearest Neighbourscited by 59
  7. 2021Diagnostics for Conditional Density Models and Bayesian Inference Algorithmscited by 28
  8. 2022Towards Instance-Wise Calibration: Local Amortized Diagnostics and Reshaping of Conditional Densities (LADaR)cited by 10
  9. 2024GalaxiesML: a dataset of galaxy images, photometry, redshifts, and structural parameters for machine learningcited by 6
  10. 2021Re-calibrating Photometric Redshift Probability Distributions Using Feature-space Regressioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.