Re-calibrating Photometric Redshift Probability Distributions Using Feature-space Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many astrophysical analyses depend on estimates of redshifts (a proxy for distance) determined from photometric (i.e., imaging) data alone. Inaccurate estimates of photometric redshift uncertainties can result in large systematic errors. However, probability distribution outputs from many photometric redshift methods do not follow the frequentist definition of a Probability Density Function (PDF) for redshift -- i.e., the fraction of times the true redshift falls between two limits z1 and z2 should be equal to the integral of the PDF between these limits. Previous works have used the global distribution of Probability Integral Transform (PIT) values to re-calibrate PDFs, but offsetting inaccuracies in different regions of feature space can conspire to limit the efficacy of the method. We leverage a recently developed regression technique that characterizes the local PIT distribution at any location in feature space to perform a local re-calibration of photometric redshift PDFs. Though we focus on an example from astrophysics, our method can produce PDFs which are calibrated at all locations in feature space for any use case.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2021.
Builds on
6 of 22 references.
References · 6
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2017Converting High-Dimensional Regression to High-Dimensional Conditional Density Estimationcited by 34
- 2021Diagnostics for Conditional Density Models and Bayesian Inference Algorithmscited by 28
- 2019Conditional Density Estimation Tools in Python and R with Applications to Photometric Redshifts and Likelihood-Free Cosmological Inferencecited by 21
- 2020Testing Goodness of Fit of Conditional Density Models with Kernelscited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.