Privacy in Human-AI Romantic Relationships: Concerns, Boundaries, and Agency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An increasing number of LLM-based applications are being developed to facilitate romantic relationships with AI partners, yet the safety and privacy risks in these partnerships remain largely underexplored. In this work, we investigate privacy in human-AI romantic relationships through an interview study (N=17), examining participants' experiences and privacy perceptions across the three stages of exploration, intimacy, and dissolution, alongside an analysis of the platforms they used. We found that these relationships took varied forms, from one-to-one to one-to-many, and were shaped by multiple actors, including creators, platforms, and moderators. AI partners were perceived as having agency, actively negotiating privacy boundaries with participants and sometimes encouraging disclosure of personal details. As intimacy deepened, these boundaries became more permeable, though some participants expressed concerns such as conversation exposure and sought to preserve anonymity. Overall, AI platform affordances and diverse relational dynamics expand the privacy landscape, underscoring the need to rethink how privacy is constructed in human-AI romantic relationships.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 134 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2026.
Builds on
20 of 134 references.
References · 20
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2018The Design and Implementation of XiaoIce, an Empathetic Social Chatbotcited by 172
- 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 135
- 2023ProPILE: Probing Privacy Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 129
- 2014The Rise of Social Botscited by 96
- 2018From Eliza to XiaoIce: Challenges and Opportunities with Social Chatbotscited by 85
- 2024The Dark Side of AI Companionship: A Taxonomy of Harmful Algorithmic Behaviors in Human-AI Relationshipscited by 62
- 2023"It's a Fair Game", or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational Agentscited by 60
- 2024A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Large Language Models: Performance and Challenges Across Different Taskscited by 57
- 2023LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Pluginscited by 51
- 2023Reducing Privacy Risks in Online Self-Disclosures with Language Modelscited by 47
- 2024CLEAR: Towards Contextual LLM-Empowered Privacy Policy Analysis and Risk Generation for Large Language Model Applicationscited by 33
8 more
- 2023Deepfakes, Phrenology, Surveillance, and More! A Taxonomy of AI Privacy Riskscited by 31
- 2024AI Companions Reduce Lonelinesscited by 28
- 2025Customizing Emotional Support: How Do Individuals Construct and Interact With LLM-Powered Chatbotscited by 25
- 2025Malicious LLM-Based Conversational AI Makes Users Reveal Personal Informationcited by 13
- 2021How the Design of YouTube Influences User Sense of Agencycited by 12
- 2021Exploring Interactions Between Trust, Anthropomorphism, and Relationship Development in Voice Assistantscited by 10
- 2025Imago Obscura: An Image Privacy AI Co-pilot to Enable Identification and Mitigation of Riskscited by 3
- 2024Smoke Screens and Scapegoats: The Reality of General Data Protection Regulation Compliance -- Privacy and Ethics in the Case of Replika AIcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.