mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Smoke Screens and Scapegoats: The Reality of General Data Protection Regulation Compliance -- Privacy and Ethics in the Case of Replika AI

arXiv 2411.04490 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2024cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Currently artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled chatbots are capturing the hearts and imaginations of the public at large. Chatbots that users can build and personalize, as well as pre-designed avatars ready for users' selection, all of these are on offer in applications to provide social companionship, friends and even love. These systems, however, have demonstrated challenges on the privacy and ethics front. This paper takes a critical approach towards examining the intricacies of these issues within AI companion services. We chose Replika as a case and employed close reading to examine the service's privacy policy. We additionally analyze articles from public media about the company and its practices to gain insight into the trustworthiness and integrity of the information provided in the policy. The aim is to ascertain whether seeming General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance equals reliability of required information, or whether the area of GDPR compliance in itself is one riddled with ethical challenges. The paper contributes to a growing body of scholarship on ethics and privacy related matters in the sphere of social chatbots. The results reveal that despite privacy notices, data collection practices might harvest personal data without users' full awareness. Cross-textual comparison reveals that privacy notice information does not fully correspond with other information sources.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.