mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HiNS: Hierarchical Negative Sampling for More Comprehensive Memory Retrieval Embedding Model

arXiv 2601.14857 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Memory-augmented language agents rely on embedding models for effective memory retrieval. However, existing training data construction overlooks a critical limitation: the hierarchical difficulty of negative samples and their natural distribution in human-agent interactions. In practice, some negatives are semantically close distractors while others are trivially irrelevant, and natural dialogue exhibits structured proportions of these types. Current approaches using synthetic or uniformly sampled negatives fail to reflect this diversity, limiting embedding models' ability to learn nuanced discrimination essential for robust memory retrieval. In this work, we propose a principled data construction framework HiNS that explicitly models negative sample difficulty tiers and incorporates empirically grounded negative ratios derived from conversational data, enabling the training of embedding models with substantially improved retrieval fidelity and generalization in memory-intensive tasks. Experiments show significant improvements: on LoCoMo, F1/BLEU-1 gains of 3.27%/3.30%(MemoryOS) and 1.95%/1.78% (Mem0); on PERSONAMEM, total score improvements of 1.19% (MemoryOS) and 2.55% (Mem0).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.

Builds on

20 of 30 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  2. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  3. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
  4. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
  5. 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agentscited by 800
  6. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
  7. 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
  8. 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 410
  9. 2025Memory in the Age of AI Agentscited by 285
  10. 2021RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-rankingcited by 175
  11. 2025Know Me, Respond to Me: Benchmarking LLMs for Dynamic User Profiling and Personalized Responses at Scalecited by 163
  12. 2021Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negativescited by 154
8 more
  1. 2023ChatDB: Augmenting LLMs with Databases as Their Symbolic Memorycited by 136
  2. 2025MemEvolve: Meta-Evolution of Agent Memory Systemscited by 81
  3. 2025Chain-of-Agents: End-to-End Agent Foundation Models via Multi-Agent Distillation and Agentic RLcited by 75
  4. 2024PerLTQA: A Personal Long-Term Memory Dataset for Memory Classification, Retrieval, and Synthesis in Question Answeringcited by 34
  5. 2025O-Mem: Omni Memory System for Personalized, Long Horizon, Self-Evolving Agentscited by 30
  6. 2025ArcMemo: Abstract Reasoning Composition with Lifelong LLM Memorycited by 22
  7. 2021Learning to Select External Knowledge with Multi-Scale Negative Samplingcited by 16
  8. 2024SyNeg: LLM-Driven Synthetic Hard-Negatives for Dense Retrievalcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.