mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reasoning with Pixel-level Precision: QVLM Architecture and SQuID Dataset for Quantitative Geospatial Analytics

arXiv 2601.13401 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) fail at quantitative spatial reasoning because their architectures destroy pixel-level information required for counting and measurements. Vision encoders compress images through patch embeddings, reducing spatial indexing and losing the precise pixel-level tracking required for accurate counting. We present two contributions to address this fundamental limitation. First, we introduce SQuID (Satellite Quantitative Intelligence Dataset), a benchmark of 2,000 satellite image Question-Answer pairs with both numerical range and categorical answers, designed to evaluate quantitative spatial reasoning. The dataset spans three difficulty tiers with annotations automatically generated from human labels and their learned variability. Second, we propose QVLM (Quantitative Vision-Language Model), a code-generation architecture that maintains pixel precision by decoupling language understanding from visual analysis. Instead of encoding images into embeddings, QVLM generates executable code that first calls a segmentation model to obtain pixel-level masks, then operates directly on these masks, preserving spatial indexing throughout the reasoning process. Our experiments show that QVLM using GPT-5 as coder achieves 42.0% accuracy on SQuID compared to 28.1% for a VLM prompted with image-question pairs. Our work reveals that, for quantitative spatial reasoning, architectural decoupling enables better accuracy on quantitative tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.

Builds on

25 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities22 Jan

Other references · 24

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  4. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
  5. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  6. 2023LISA: Reasoning Segmentation via Large Language Modelcited by 770
  7. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  8. 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 591
  9. 2022Vision Transformer Adapter for Dense Predictionscited by 564
  10. 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without trainingcited by 507
  11. 2023RemoteCLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model for Remote Sensingcited by 357
  12. 2023GeoChat: Grounded Large Vision-Language Model for Remote Sensingcited by 320
12 more
  1. 2024VHM: Versatile and Honest Vision Language Model for Remote Sensing Image Analysiscited by 84
  2. 2023EarthVQA: Towards Queryable Earth via Relational Reasoning-Based Remote Sensing Visual Question Answeringcited by 51
  3. 2024GEOBench-VLM: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Geospatial Taskscited by 50
  4. 2023Modular Visual Question Answering via Code Generationcited by 47
  5. 2023Text2Seg: Remote Sensing Image Semantic Segmentation via Text-Guided Visual Foundation Modelscited by 44
  6. 2024Good at captioning, bad at counting: Benchmarking GPT-4V on Earth observation datacited by 39
  7. 2024SegEarth-OV: Towards Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Segmentation for Remote Sensing Imagescited by 25
  8. 2023HRVQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark for High-Resolution Aerial Imagescited by 21
  9. 2024ConMe: Rethinking Evaluation of Compositional Reasoning for Modern VLMscited by 21
  10. 2025Lost in Embeddings: Information Loss in Vision-Language Modelscited by 18
  11. 2025RSVLM-QA: A Benchmark Dataset for Remote Sensing Vision Language Model-based Question Answeringcited by 17
  12. 2018Aerial Imagery for Roof Segmentation: A Large-Scale Dataset towards Automatic Mapping of Buildingscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SpaRE: Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Synthetic Data
  2. 2024Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026SpatiaLQA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Logical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025SVQA-R1: Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs via View-Consistent Reward Optimization
  5. 2025InternSpatial: A Comprehensive Dataset for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligence
  8. 2026SpatiaLab: Can Vision-Language Models Perform Spatial Reasoning in the Wild?